These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22899585)

  • 1. Doing dissections differently: a structured, peer-assisted learning approach to maximizing learning in dissections.
    Hall ER; Davis RC; Weller R; Powney S; Williams SB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22899585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
    Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
    Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
    Granger NA; Calleson D
    Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory.
    Bentley BS; Hill RV
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):143-9. PubMed ID: 19637291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course.
    Han ER; Chung EK; Nam KI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142988. PubMed ID: 26565616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Krych AJ; March CN; Bryan RE; Peake BJ; Pawlina W; Carmichael SW
    Clin Anat; 2005 May; 18(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 15832347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
    Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Near-peer driven dissection selective: A primer to the medical school anatomy course.
    Cantwell S; Bonadurer GF; Pawlina W; Lachman N
    Clin Anat; 2015 Nov; 28(8):985-93. PubMed ID: 26375596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of specially designed tasks to enhance student interest in the cadaver dissection laboratory.
    Kang SH; Shin JS; Hwang YI
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 22143981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dead center of the dental curriculum: changing attitudes of dental students during dissection.
    Redwood CJ; Townsend GC
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1333-44. PubMed ID: 22012777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study.
    Lempp HK
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15733168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Student-centered integrated anatomy resource sessions at Alfaisal University.
    Cowan M; Arain NN; Assale TS; Assi AH; Albar RA; Ganguly PK
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 20814913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Student perception of a new integrated anatomy practical program: does students' prior learning make a difference?
    Tedman RA; Alexander H; Massa H; Moses D
    Clin Anat; 2011 Jul; 24(5):664-70. PubMed ID: 21438022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gross anatomy dissections and self-directed learning in medicine.
    Arroyo-Jimenez Mdel M; Marcos P; Martinez-Marcos A; Artacho-Pérula E; Blaizot X; Muñoz M; Alfonso-Roca MT; Insausti R
    Clin Anat; 2005 Jul; 18(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 15971224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Students' evaluation on a two-stage anatomy curriculum.
    Leung KK; Lue BH; Lu KS; Huang TS
    Med Teach; 2006 Mar; 28(2):e59-63. PubMed ID: 16707286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Team-based learning in anatomy: an efficient, effective, and economical strategy.
    Vasan NS; DeFouw DO; Compton S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(6):333-9. PubMed ID: 21998012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep dissection: motivating students beyond rote learning in veterinary anatomy.
    Cake MA
    J Vet Med Educ; 2006; 33(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 16849308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group in-course assessment promotes cooperative learning and increases performance.
    Pratten MK; Merrick D; Burr SA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 24039224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.