90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22900505)
1. Comparison of expandable and fixed interbody cages in a human cadaver corpectomy model, part I: endplate force characteristics.
Pekmezci M; Tang JA; Cheng L; Modak A; McClellan RT; Buckley JM; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Oct; 17(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 22900505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Expandable and Fixed Interbody Cages in a Human Cadaver Corpectomy Model: Fatigue Characteristics.
Pekmezci M; Tang JA; Cheng L; Modak A; McClellan RT; Buckley JM; Ames CP
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Nov; 29(9):387-393. PubMed ID: 22925989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological outcomes of static vs expandable titanium cages after corpectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis of subsidence.
Lau D; Song Y; Guan Z; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurgery; 2013 Apr; 72(4):529-39; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 23246824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of design and positioning of carbon fiber lumbar interbody cages and their subsidence in vertebral bodies.
Lam FC; Alkalay R; Groff MW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr; 25(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 21430566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Torque forces of expandable titanium vertebral body replacement cages during expansion and subsidence in the osteoporotic lumbar spine.
Sircar K; Weber M; Walter SG; Ott N; Prescher A; Eysel P; Kernich N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Apr; 114():106239. PubMed ID: 38599132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Expandable cages: biomechanical comparison of different cages for ventral spondylodesis in the thoracolumbar spine].
Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; Schaefer J; Schleicher P; Pflugmacher R; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
Chirurg; 2004 Jul; 75(7):694-701. PubMed ID: 15258751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Bhatia NN; Lee KH; Bui CN; Luna M; Wahba GM; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Lateral Expandable Cage with Independently Adjustable Anterior and Posterior Heights Can Improve the Pressure Distribution at the Cage-Endplate Interface: A Biomechanics Study.
Kusins J; Uyekawa S; Singh G; Peng Y; McQuarrie C; Holman P; Cheng I; Jekir M
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 181():e722-e731. PubMed ID: 37898279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement in vertebral endplate engagement following anterior column reconstruction using a novel expandable cage with self-adjusting, multiaxial end cap.
Stinchfield T; Vadapalli S; Pennington Z; Sivagnanam R; Prevost J; Schroeder G; Sciubba DM
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 67():249-254. PubMed ID: 31227401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new bone surrogate model for testing interbody device subsidence.
Au AG; Aiyangar AK; Anderson PA; Ploeg HL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(16):1289-96. PubMed ID: 21311401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corpectomy cage subsidence with rectangular versus round endcaps.
Deukmedjian AR; Manwaring J; Le TV; Turner AW; Uribe JS
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1632-6. PubMed ID: 24831343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [In-vitro measurement of loading using an instrumented vertebral internal fixator].
Rohlmann A; Eick O; Bergmann G; Graichen F
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1995; 133(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 7754660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does Spanning a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Cage Across the Vertebral Ring Apophysis Increase Loads Required for Failure and Mitigate Endplate Violation.
Briski DC; Goel VK; Waddell BS; Serhan H; Kodigudla MK; Palepu V; Agarwal AK; Zavatsky JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1158-E1164. PubMed ID: 28472018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.
Zhou CS; Xu YF; Zhang Y; Chen Z; Lv H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Dec; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25496488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
