124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2290148)
1. [Imaging of cancer of the uterine cervix].
Soyer P; Michel G; Masselot J
J Radiol; 1990 Dec; 71(12):681-9. PubMed ID: 2290148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Yang WT; Walkden SB; Ho S; Cheung TH; Lam SK; Teo J; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):610-6. PubMed ID: 8696696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging in cervical cancer.
Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Byun JM; Kim YN; Jeong DH; Kim KT; Sung MS; Lee KB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Oct; 23(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 24257560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Ludovisi M; Manfredi R; Zannoni G; Gui B; Basso D; Di Legge A; Licameli A; Di Bidino R; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 19705403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Use of transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of early-stage cervical cancer].
Fischerová D; Cibula D; Stenhová H; Vondrichová H; Zikán M; Freitag P; Sláma J; Pavlsta D; Pinkavová I; Dundr P
Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Oct; 74(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 20063834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multimodal endocavitary ultrasound versus MRI and clinical findings in pre- and post-treatment advanced cervical cancer. Preliminary report.
Csutak C; Badea R; Bolboaca SD; Ordeanu C; Nagy VM; Fekete Z; Chiorean L; Dudea SM
Med Ultrason; 2016 Mar; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 26962558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experience with the combined diagnosis and therapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage FIGO IIB-III). Transrectal ultrasonography and CT in the staging and in follow-up after therapy. Preliminary results].
Marano P; Summaria V; Smaniotto D; Danza FM; Speca S; Valentini AL; Greggi S; Lancia M; Cellini N
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 8272550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Di Legge A; De Blasis I; Moruzzi MC; Bonatti M; Collarino A; Rufini V; Manfredi R
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):741-68. PubMed ID: 24861248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer.
Fischerova D; Cibula D; Stenhova H; Vondrichova H; Calda P; Zikan M; Freitag P; Slama J; Dundr P; Belacek J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 17892456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive value of clinical examination, transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging prior to radiotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix.
Hawnaur JM; Johnson RJ; Carrington BM; Hunter RD
Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):819-27. PubMed ID: 9828793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staging of cervical cancer: reliability of transrectal US.
Innocenti P; Pulli F; Savino L; Nicolucci A; Pandimiglio A; Menchi I; Massi G
Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 1523308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The place of lymphography and computed tomography in the determination of lymph node status in primary cancer of the cervix].
Räber G; Lüning M; Pötzschke B; Natho W
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(4):449-59. PubMed ID: 3775010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
