109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22901710)
1. Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?
Stewart RD; Bleich AT; Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 207(4):290.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22901710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tachysystole in term labor: incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and effect on fetal heart tracings.
Heuser CC; Knight S; Esplin MS; Eller AG; Holmgren CM; Manuck TA; Richards D; Henry E; Jackson GM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 209(1):32.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23571133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does nifedipine prevent the tachysystole associated with misoprostol induction?
Chao A; El-Sayed YY; Sapugay AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Apr; 11(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 12375683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with dinoprostone and misoprostol cervical ripening.
Ramsey PS; Meyer L; Walkes BA; Harris D; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15625147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Sifakis S; Angelakis E; Avgoustinakis E; Fragouli Y; Mantas N; Koukoura O; Vardaki E; Koumantakis E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Apr; 275(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 17028904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.
Lin MG; Nuthalapaty FS; Carver AR; Case AS; Ramsey PS
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 16135593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol induction of labor among women with a history of cesarean delivery.
Choy-Hee L; Raynor BD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1115-7. PubMed ID: 11349173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
Jouatte F; Subtil D; Marquis P; Plennevaux JL; Puech F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women.
Cheng SY; Hsue CS; Hwang GH; Chen W; Li TC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20178530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tachysystole Following Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor Is Not Associated with Adverse Outcomes.
Bofill JA; Darby MM; Castillo J; Sawardecker SU; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 27816973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
Cheng SY; Chen TC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of misoprostol-related tachysystole in normal and high risk pregnancies.
Akhan SE; Yidirim A; Iyibozkurt AC; Turfanda A
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2000; 27(3-4):207-11. PubMed ID: 11214953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
