216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22902385)
1. Double-effect reasoning and the conception of human embryos.
Murphy TF
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):529-32. PubMed ID: 22902385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Embryo loss and double effect.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):537-40. PubMed ID: 23292218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument.
Devolder K
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):533-6. PubMed ID: 23139393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The scourge: moral implications of natural embryo loss.
Ord T
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):12-9. PubMed ID: 18759175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The protection of the human embryo in vitro. Report by the Working Party of the Human Embryo and Fetus.
Council of Europe. Steering Committee on Bioethics
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2004; 10(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 15459990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Of embryos and empire.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2003; (2):3-16. PubMed ID: 15584196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The afterlife of embryonic persons: what a strange place heaven must be.
Murphy TF
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):684-8. PubMed ID: 23063818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IVF technology and the argument from potential.
Singer P; Dawson K
Philos Public Aff; 1988; 17(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 11659114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "More on respect for embryos and potentiality: does respect for embryos entail respect for in vitro embryos?".
Hanson SS
Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 16909335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.
Strong C
J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):457-78. PubMed ID: 9360198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryos, individuals, and persons: an argument against embryo creation and research.
Tollefsen C
J Appl Philos; 2001; 18(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 14582501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryo research: the standard arguments.
Institute of Medical Ethics (Great Britain)
Brief Med Ethics; 1990 Mar; No. 5():1-3. PubMed ID: 11659228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro fertilization: the ethical issues (II).
Warnock M
Philos Q; 1983 Jul; 33(132):238-49. PubMed ID: 11651765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Against experimentation on human embryos.
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (Rome). Centre of Bioethics
Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; No. 122():9-11. PubMed ID: 11654867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Embryos, the principle of proportionality, and the shaky ground of moral respect.
Pugh J
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):420-6. PubMed ID: 23445499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Price to pay: the misuse of embryos.
Hall AL
Christ Century; 2004 Jun; 121(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 15459987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"?
Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What qualifies as a live embryo?
Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):23-5; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Totipotency, twinning, and ensoulment at fertilization.
Koch-Hershenov R
J Med Philos; 2006 Apr; 31(2):139-64. PubMed ID: 16595345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
