These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2290376)

  • 1. [Design aspects and hydrodynamic characteristics of the Bionics heart valves].
    Fursov BA; Kartoshkin VM; Gorshkov IuV; Zaĭtsev LV; Evdokimov SV; Mel'nikov AP; Zaĭtsev VV
    Med Tekh; 1990; (6):32-5. PubMed ID: 2290376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
    Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydrodynamic performance of heart valve prostheses: open discussion on European Committee for Standardization International Organization for Standardization standard 5840.
    Susin FM; Bagno A; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1356-7. PubMed ID: 20412971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexible bioprosthetic pericardial heart valve.
    Ross DN
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Apr; 28(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 6156502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paravalvular leaks around prosthetic valves implanted in the mitral position: technical refinements of the ovine model.
    Linden BC; Schumacher CW; MacIver RH; Mrachek JP; Bianco RW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 May; 12(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 12803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new porcine bioprosthesis: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
    Reece IJ; Anderson JD; Wain WH; Carr K; Toner PG; Tindale W; Black MM; Wheatley DJ
    Life Support Syst; 1985; 3(3):207-27. PubMed ID: 4046637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel "biomechanical" polymeric valve prostheses with special design for aortic and mitral position: a future option for pediatric patients?
    Sachweh JS; Daebritz SH
    ASAIO J; 2006; 52(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 16966862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of pressure- and volume-loss of technical and biological heart valve prostheses.
    Köhler J
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():272-6. PubMed ID: 3727699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which valve and which size should we use in the valve-on-valve technique for re-do mitral valve surgery?
    Shibata T; Inoue K; Ikuta T; Bito Y; Yoshioka Y; Mizoguchi H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 8(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 19010939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.