BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22904695)

  • 1. Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Cino EA; Choy WY; Karttunen M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Aug; 8(8):2725-2740. PubMed ID: 22904695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
    Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical Assessment of Current Force Fields. Short Peptide Test Case.
    Vymětal J; Vondrášek J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jan; 9(1):441-51. PubMed ID: 26589046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational and Experimental Evaluation of Designed β-Cap Hairpins Using Molecular Simulations and Kinetic Network Models.
    Ge Y; Kier BL; Andersen NH; Voelz VA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jul; 57(7):1609-1620. PubMed ID: 28614661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Updated Test of AMBER Force Fields and Implicit Solvent Models in Predicting the Secondary Structure of Helical, β-Hairpin, and Intrinsically Disordered Peptides.
    Maffucci I; Contini A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Feb; 12(2):714-27. PubMed ID: 26784558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements.
    Beauchamp KA; Lin YS; Das R; Pande VS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1409-1414. PubMed ID: 22754404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
    Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic properties of force fields.
    Vitalini F; Mey AS; Noé F; Keller BG
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Feb; 142(8):084101. PubMed ID: 25725706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microsecond simulations of mdm2 and its complex with p53 yield insight into force field accuracy and conformational dynamics.
    Pantelopulos GA; Mukherjee S; Voelz VA
    Proteins; 2015 Sep; 83(9):1665-76. PubMed ID: 26138282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different force fields on the structural character of α synuclein β-hairpin peptide (35-56) in aqueous environment.
    Kundu S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Feb; 36(2):302-317. PubMed ID: 28024449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Dependence of Amyloid-β Dynamics on Protein Force Fields and Water Models.
    Somavarapu AK; Kepp KP
    Chemphyschem; 2015 Oct; 16(15):3278-89. PubMed ID: 26256268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conformational dynamics of HIV-1 protease: a comparative molecular dynamics simulation study with multiple amber force fields.
    Meher BR; Kumar MV; Sharma S; Bandyopadhyay P
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2012 Dec; 10(6):1250018. PubMed ID: 22845837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
    Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.
    Lindorff-Larsen K; Piana S; Palmo K; Maragakis P; Klepeis JL; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Proteins; 2010 Jun; 78(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 20408171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
    Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Force Field Benchmark of Amino Acids. 2. Partition Coefficients between Water and Organic Solvents.
    Zhang H; Jiang Y; Cui Z; Yin C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1669-1681. PubMed ID: 30047730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Free energy profile of RNA hairpins: a molecular dynamics simulation study.
    Deng NJ; Cieplak P
    Biophys J; 2010 Feb; 98(4):627-36. PubMed ID: 20159159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force field influences in beta-hairpin folding simulations.
    Lwin TZ; Luo R
    Protein Sci; 2006 Nov; 15(11):2642-55. PubMed ID: 17075138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the mechanism of CLN025 beta-hairpin formation.
    McKiernan KA; Husic BE; Pande VS
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Sep; 147(10):104107. PubMed ID: 28915754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein simulations with an optimized water model: cooperative helix formation and temperature-induced unfolded state collapse.
    Best RB; Mittal J
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Nov; 114(46):14916-23. PubMed ID: 21038907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.