These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22905829)

  • 1. Interference between outcomes, spontaneous recovery, and context effects as measured by a cued response reaction time task: evidence for associative retrieval models.
    González-Martín E; Cobos PL; Morís J; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 22905829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.
    Cobos PL; González-Martín E; Varona-Moya S; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 23855459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1120-32. PubMed ID: 16938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments.
    Sim EJ; Kiefer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 15993764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrieval-induced forgetting and interference between cues: training a cue-outcome association attenuates retrieval by alternative cues.
    Ortega-Castro N; Vadillo MA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():19-25. PubMed ID: 23201373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits.
    Badham SP; Estes Z; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 21639644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic activation and letter search: blocking or suppression?
    Cinel C; Avons SE; Russo R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):580-94. PubMed ID: 19606403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials indicate different processes to mediate categorical and associative priming in person recognition.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1246-63. PubMed ID: 18763903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory asymmetry of forward and backward associations in recognition tasks.
    Yang J; Zhao P; Zhu Z; Mecklinger A; Fang Z; Li H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):253-69. PubMed ID: 22924326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Content-specific activation during associative long-term memory retrieval.
    Khader P; Burke M; Bien S; Ranganath C; Rösler F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):805-16. PubMed ID: 15964209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociations between expectancy and performance in simple and two-choice reaction-time tasks: A test of associative and nonassociative explanations.
    Barrett LC; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):864-77. PubMed ID: 20565206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What antipriming reveals about priming.
    Marsolek CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 18403251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.