These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22905841)

  • 1. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implanted electronic devices: a paradigm shift for the 21st century.
    Cronin EM; Varma N
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2012 Jul; 9(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 22905841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis.
    Cronin EM; Ching EA; Varma N; Martin DO; Wilkoff BL; Lindsay BD
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Dec; 9(12):1947-51. PubMed ID: 22864266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the use of remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up.
    Yee R; Verma A; Beardsall M; Fraser J; Philippon F; Exner DV
    Can J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 29(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 23465345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remote patient monitoring in chronic heart failure.
    Palaniswamy C; Mishkin A; Aronow WS; Kalra A; Frishman WH
    Cardiol Rev; 2013; 21(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 23018667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remote monitoring for implantable cardiac electronic devices.
    Young GD
    Heart Lung Circ; 2012 Jun; 21(6-7):352-7. PubMed ID: 22520207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic: results from a randomized pilot clinical trial.
    Al-Khatib SM; Piccini JP; Knight D; Stewart M; Clapp-Channing N; Sanders GD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 21(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 20021522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and economic impact of remote monitoring on the follow-up of patients with implantable electronic cardiovascular devices: an observational study.
    Costa PD; Reis AH; Rodrigues PP
    Telemed J E Health; 2013 Feb; 19(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 23336734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implantable hemodynamic monitors.
    Tallaj JA; Singla I; Bourge RC
    Cardiol Clin; 2011 May; 29(2):289-99. PubMed ID: 21459250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote monitoring: a cost or an investment?
    Burri H; Heidbüchel H; Jung W; Brugada P
    Europace; 2011 May; 13 Suppl 2():ii44-8. PubMed ID: 21518749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remote monitoring of patients with implanted cardiac devices.
    Kusumoto F; Goldschlager N
    Clin Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 33(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 20063296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Remote Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes.
    Varma N; Ricci RP
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1388-95. PubMed ID: 26337400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Heidbüchel H; Lioen P; Foulon S; Huybrechts W; Ector J; Willems R; Ector H
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18245771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of remote monitoring in cardiac implantable device follow-up.
    Stoepel C; Boland J; Busca R; Saal G; Oliveira M
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Dec; 15(10):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20028193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal and organizational aspects of remote cardiac monitoring: the example of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Vinck I; De Laet C; Stroobandt S; Van Brabandt H
    Europace; 2012 Sep; 14(9):1230-5. PubMed ID: 22345377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
    Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.
    Varma N
    Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of remote monitoring in the management of syncope and palpitations.
    Furukawa T; Maggi R; Bertolone C; Ammirati F; Santini M; Ricci R; Giada F; Brignole M
    Europace; 2011 Mar; 13(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 21242154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review on remote monitoring technology applied to implantable electronic cardiovascular devices.
    Costa PD; Rodrigues PP; Reis AH; Costa-Pereira A
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Dec; 16(10):1042-50. PubMed ID: 21070132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices: health technology assessment ].
    Ricci RP; Locati ET; Campana A; Cavallaro C; Giammaria M; Landolina M; Marzegalli M; Melissano D
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2015 May; 16(5):295-303. PubMed ID: 25994466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heart failure patients monitored with telemedicine: patient satisfaction, a review of the literature.
    Kraai IH; Luttik ML; de Jong RM; Jaarsma T; Hillege HL
    J Card Fail; 2011 Aug; 17(8):684-90. PubMed ID: 21807331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.