These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22905841)

  • 21. Pacemaker remote monitoring in the pediatric population: is it a real solution?
    Leoni L; Padalino M; Biffanti R; Ferretto S; Vettor G; Corrado D; Stellin G; Milanesi O; Iliceto S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 38(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 25645302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of a remote monitoring system for implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Masella C; Zanaboni P; Di Stasi F; Gilardi S; Ponzi P; Valsecchi S
    J Telemed Telecare; 2008; 14(6):290-4. PubMed ID: 18776073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Technology platforms for remote monitoring of vital signs in the new era of telemedicine.
    Zhao F; Li M; Tsien JZ
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 Jul; 12(4):411-29. PubMed ID: 26037691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Activation of remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices: small dog for tall weeds.
    D'Ancona G; Safak E; Senges J; Hochadel M; Nguyen VL; Perings C; Jung W; Spitzer S; Eckardt L; Brachmann J; Seidl K; Hink HU; Ince H; Ortak J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 106(10):833-839. PubMed ID: 28593341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of implantable hemodynamic monitors to manage heart failure.
    Abraham WT
    Heart Fail Clin; 2015 Apr; 11(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 25834968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of continuous intracardiac ST-segment monitoring on mid-term outcomes of ICD-implanted patients with coronary artery disease. Early results of a prospective comparison with conventional ICD outcomes.
    Forleo GB; Tesauro M; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Sergi D; Di Molfetta A; Santini L; Romeo F
    Heart; 2012 Mar; 98(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 22115985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intensive care telemedicine: evaluating a model for proactive remote monitoring and intervention in the critical care setting.
    Groves RH; Holcomb BW; Smith ML
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 131():131-46. PubMed ID: 18305328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Consensus document on remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: technology, indications, organizational models, acceptability, responsibility, and economic issues].
    Ricci RP; Calcagnini G; Castro A; Giada F; Igidbashan D; Landolina M; Melissano D; Perego GB; Toselli T
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2011 Jun; 12(6):450-67. PubMed ID: 21691382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable devices in the pediatric population improves detection of adverse events.
    Malloy LE; Gingerich J; Olson MD; Atkins DL
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 23949666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implantable hemodynamic monitors.
    Tallaj JA; Singla I; Bourge RC
    Heart Fail Clin; 2009 Apr; 5(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 19249694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remote Active Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure (RAPID-RF): design and rationale.
    Saxon LA; Boehmer JP; Neuman S; Mullin CM
    J Card Fail; 2007 May; 13(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 17517341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implantable cardiac devices: the utility of remote monitoring in a paediatric and CHD population.
    Olen MM; Dechert-Crooks B
    Cardiol Young; 2017 Jan; 27(S1):S143-S146. PubMed ID: 28084972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) study: rationale and design.
    Burri H; Quesada A; Ricci RP; Boriani G; Davinelli M; Favale S; Da Costa A; Kautzner J; Moser R; Navarro X; Santini M
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20598971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Remote device interrogation: when "nothing" really does matter.
    Gimbel JR
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Dec; 9(12):1952-3. PubMed ID: 23063863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integration of monitoring technology for heart failure.
    Clarke B; Howlett J
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 27(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 22274575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current modalities for invasive and non-invasive monitoring of volume status in heart failure.
    von Lueder TG; Krum H
    Heart; 2012 Jul; 98(13):967-73. PubMed ID: 22572046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Remote monitoring for active cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a European survey.
    Halimi F; Cantù F;
    Europace; 2010 Dec; 12(12):1778-80. PubMed ID: 21097482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of implantable devices for continuous ambulatory monitoring of central hemodynamic values in heart failure patients.
    Bennett T; Kjellstrom B; Taepke R; Ryden L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):573-84. PubMed ID: 15955193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remote monitoring of heart failure: benefits for therapeutic decision making.
    Martirosyan M; Caliskan K; Theuns DAMJ; Szili-Torok T
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2017 Jul; 15(7):503-515. PubMed ID: 28656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Data Integration and Interoperability for Patient-Centered Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.
    Daley C; Toscos T; Mirro M
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2019 Mar; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 30884894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.