These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22905932)

  • 1. Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli.
    Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Donkin C; Denton SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):801-20. PubMed ID: 22905932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization.
    Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Denton SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 21058874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The structure of integral dimensions: contrasting topological and Cartesian representations.
    Jones M; Goldstone RL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):111-132. PubMed ID: 22799263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can we perceive two colors at the same time? A direct test of Huang and Pashler's (2007) Boolean map theory of visual attention.
    Fitousi D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1532-1550. PubMed ID: 30684206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions.
    Blunden AG; Wang T; Griffiths DW; Little DR
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1531. PubMed ID: 25620941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The processing architectures of whole-object features: A logical-rules approach.
    Moneer S; Wang T; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1443-65. PubMed ID: 27123676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology.
    Fific M; Nosofsky RM; Townsend JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):356-75. PubMed ID: 18377176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unsupervised category learning with integral-dimension stimuli.
    Ell SW; Ashby FG; Hutchinson S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1537-62. PubMed ID: 22506861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.
    Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 20384405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalization of feature- and rule-based learning in the categorization of dimensional stimuli: evidence for dual processes under cognitive control.
    Natal SD; McLaren IP; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 23421398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorization of photographic images by rats using shape-based image dimensions.
    Brooks DI; Ng KH; Buss EW; Marshall AT; Freeman JH; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 23316977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrality/separability of stimulus dimensions and multidimensional generalization in pigeons.
    Soto FA; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 20384400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination.
    Pearce JM; George DN
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):349-64. PubMed ID: 12350286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control.
    Vietze I; Wendt M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1391-400. PubMed ID: 19048452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.
    Cheng XJ; McCarthy CJ; Wang TSL; Palmeri TJ; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):833-862. PubMed ID: 29683707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.