BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22906190)

  • 21. The capacity to consent to treatment and research: a review of standardized assessment tools.
    Sturman ED
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2005 Nov; 25(7):954-74. PubMed ID: 15964671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of understanding by people manifesting mental retardation: a preliminary report.
    Coles EM; Freitas TT; Tweed R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 8873190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Development of competency to stand trial rating scale in offenders with mental disorders].
    Chen XB; Cai WX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 29(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 23930501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Competency to stand trial evaluations in a multicultural population: Associations between psychiatric, demographic, and legal factors.
    Paradis CM; Owen E; Solomon LZ; Lane B; Gulrajani C; Fullar M; Perry A; Rai S; Lavy T; McCullough G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():79-85. PubMed ID: 27085728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the effectiveness of an intervention designed for the restoration of competency to stand trial.
    Mueller C; Wylie AM
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):891-900. PubMed ID: 18046737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mental illness and intellectual disability in Magistrates Courts in New South Wales, Australia.
    Vanny KA; Levy MH; Greenberg DM; Hayes SC
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Mar; 53(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 19250389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Future orientation and competence to stand trial: the fragility of competence.
    Kivisto AJ; Moore TM; Fite PA; Seidner BG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):316-26. PubMed ID: 21908747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A clinical study of competency in psychiatric inpatients.
    Billick SB; Naylor PW; Majeske MF; Burgert W; Davis GP
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 9001748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: potential problems and issues.
    Hurley KE; Deal WP
    Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 16689611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Utility of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in psychiatric outpatients with intellectual disabilities.
    Wieland J; Wardenaar KJ; Fontein E; Zitman FG
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2012 Sep; 56(9):843-53. PubMed ID: 21726320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Assessment of legal functional capacity of a neuropsychiatric patient].
    Juva K
    Duodecim; 2013; 129(18):1886-92. PubMed ID: 24187779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mental capacity to consent to treatment and admission decisions in older adult psychiatric inpatients.
    Maxmin K; Cooper C; Potter L; Livingston G
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2009 Dec; 24(12):1367-75. PubMed ID: 19378346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Demographic, criminogenic, and psychiatric factors that predict competency restoration.
    Colwell LH; Gianesini J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 21908744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting treatment outcome for incompetent defendants.
    Nicholson RA; Barnard GW; Robbins L; Hankins G
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 7841508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW; Grandjean NR; Vitacco MJ
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12056080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The civil legal procedural competence of schizophrenia patients].
    Gorinov VV; Koroleva EV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1996; 39(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 8754516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decision making for incompetent patients: who decides and by what standards?
    Weyrauch S
    Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):765-89. PubMed ID: 16281327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Substituted decision making: elder guardianship.
    Leatherman ME; Goethe KE
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2009 Nov; 15(6):470-6. PubMed ID: 19934723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.