81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22906473)
21. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ranking analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes.
Qi Y; Sun H; Sun Q; Pan L
Genomics; 2011 May; 97(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 21402142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Chen J; Sarkar SK
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Joint analysis of two microarray gene-expression data sets to select lung adenocarcinoma marker genes.
Jiang H; Deng Y; Chen HS; Tao L; Sha Q; Chen J; Tsai CJ; Zhang S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jun; 5():81. PubMed ID: 15217521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identifying differentially expressed genes in cancer patients using a non-parameter Ising model.
Li X; Feltus FA; Sun X; Wang JZ; Luo F
Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(19):3845-52. PubMed ID: 21761563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comprehensive evaluation of SAM, the SAM R-package and a simple modification to improve its performance.
Zhang S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():230. PubMed ID: 17603887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Cancer Inform; 2008 Jan; 3():140-8. PubMed ID: 19455258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gene selection with the δ-sequence method.
Qiu X; Klebanov L
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 972():57-71. PubMed ID: 23385531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sample size calculation for microarray experiments with blocked one-way design.
Jung SH; Sohn I; George SL; Feng L; Leppert PC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 10():164. PubMed ID: 19476634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new method for estimating the number of non-differentially expressed genes.
Wu J; Liu CY; Chen WT; Ma WY; Ding Y
Genet Mol Res; 2016 Mar; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 27051004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Orthology-based multilevel modeling of differentially expressed mouse and human gene pairs.
Ogorek BA; Stefanski LA
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article 2. PubMed ID: 19222385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A robust statistical procedure to discover expression biomarkers using microarray genomic expression data.
Zou YY; Yang J; Zhu J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Aug; 7(8):603-7. PubMed ID: 16845711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups.
Zhang J; Coombes KR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S1. PubMed ID: 23320794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
Jiao S; Zhang S
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Wavelet-based detection of transcriptional activity on a novel Staphylococcus aureus tiling microarray.
Segura V; Toledo-Arana A; Uzqueda M; Lasa I; Muñoz-Barrutia A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():222. PubMed ID: 22950634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses under sparse dependence: Adaptive FDR controlling in microarray data.
Biswas A; Chakraborty S; Baruah VJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):917-927. PubMed ID: 35133933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multivariate Method for Inferential Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Gene Expression Experiments.
Acosta JP; Restrepo S; Henao JD; López-Kleine L
J Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):866-874. PubMed ID: 31063414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new test statistic based on shrunken sample variance for identifying differentially expressed genes in small microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Bioinform Biol Insights; 2008 Feb; 2():145-56. PubMed ID: 19812772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
