These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

800 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22906814)

  • 1. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural mechanisms underlying conflict monitoring over risky decision alternatives: evidence from ERP in a Go/Nogo task.
    Wang S; Hui N; Zhou X; He K; Yu Y; Shuai J
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 13(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 25164361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study.
    Smith JL; Jamadar S; Provost AL; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 22885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task.
    Oddy BW; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP.
    Nakata H; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 22(7):1784-92. PubMed ID: 16197519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term training in the Go/Nogo task: behavioural and neural changes depend on task demands.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 23247193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.