These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22906915)

  • 1. Suppression of predation on the intermediate host by two trophically-transmitted parasites when uninfective.
    Weinreich F; Benesh DP; Milinski M
    Parasitology; 2013 Jan; 140(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 22906915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intraspecific conflicts between parasites over host manipulation.
    Hafer N; Milinski M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Feb; 283(1824):. PubMed ID: 26842574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus alters the activity and response, but not the predation susceptibility of infected copepods.
    Urdal K; Tierney JF; Jakobsen PJ
    J Parasitol; 1995 Apr; 81(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 7707222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Triaenophorus crassus (Cestoda) infection on behavior and susceptibility to predation of the first intermediate host Cyclops strenuus (Copepoda).
    Pulkkinen K; Pasternak AF; Hasu T; Valtonen ET
    J Parasitol; 2000 Aug; 86(4):664-70. PubMed ID: 10958437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When to go: optimization of host switching in parasites with complex life cycles.
    Hammerschmidt K; Koch K; Milinski M; Chubb JC; Parker GA
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):1976-86. PubMed ID: 19453381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When parasites disagree: evidence for parasite-induced sabotage of host manipulation.
    Hafer N; Milinski M
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25643621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective predation on parasitized prey--a comparison between two helminth species with different life-history strategies.
    Knudsen R; Gabler HM; Kuris AM; Amundsen PA
    J Parasitol; 2001 Oct; 87(5):941-5. PubMed ID: 11695412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evolution of parasitic host manipulation.
    Hafer-Hahmann N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jan; 286(1895):20182413. PubMed ID: 30963953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When should a trophically transmitted parasite manipulate its host?
    Parker GA; Ball MA; Chubb JC; Hammerschmidt K; Milinski M
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):448-58. PubMed ID: 19154358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crowding in the first intermediate host does not affect infection probability in the second host in two helminths.
    Benesh DP
    J Helminthol; 2019 Mar; 93(2):172-176. PubMed ID: 29441842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ecological immunology of a tapeworms' interaction with its two consecutive hosts.
    Hammerschmidt K; Kurtz J
    Adv Parasitol; 2009; 68():111-37. PubMed ID: 19289192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Growth and ontogeny of the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus in its copepod first host affects performance in its stickleback second intermediate host.
    Benesh DP; Hafer N
    Parasit Vectors; 2012 May; 5():90. PubMed ID: 22564512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus - is there local adaptation?
    Hafer N
    Parasitology; 2018 May; 145(6):762-769. PubMed ID: 29113596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Costly carotenoids: a trade-off between predation and infection risk?
    van Der Veen IT
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):992-9. PubMed ID: 16033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altered host behaviour: manipulation or energy depletion in tapeworm-infected copepods?
    Franz K; Kurtz J
    Parasitology; 2002 Aug; 125(Pt 2):187-96. PubMed ID: 12211611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Monoxenous and heteroxenous parasites of fish manipulate behavior of their hosts in different ways].
    Mikheev VN
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2011; 72(3):183-97. PubMed ID: 21786661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioural and physiological effects of the trophically transmitted cestode parasite, Cyathocephalus truncatus, on its intermediate host, Gammarus pulex.
    Franceschi N; Rigaud T; Moret Y; Hervant F; Bollache L
    Parasitology; 2007 Nov; 134(Pt 12):1839-47. PubMed ID: 17640401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility of eye fluke-infected fish to predation by bird hosts.
    Seppälä O; Karvonen A; Valtonen ET
    Parasitology; 2006 Apr; 132(Pt 4):575-9. PubMed ID: 16332291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parasite-induced alteration of plastic response to predation threat: increased refuge use but lower food intake in Gammarus pulex infected with the acanothocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis.
    Dianne L; Perrot-Minnot MJ; Bauer A; Guvenatam A; Rigaud T
    Int J Parasitol; 2014 Mar; 44(3-4):211-6. PubMed ID: 24291320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Host manipulation by parasites in the world of dead-end predators: adaptation to enhance transmission?
    Seppälä O; Valtonen ET; Benesh DP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jul; 275(1643):1611-5. PubMed ID: 18430644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.