These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22907441)

  • 1. Validation of a method for odor sampling on solid area sources.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Barczak R; Il Grande M; Del Rosso R
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(8):1607-13. PubMed ID: 22907441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and validation of a wind tunnel system for odour sampling on liquid area sources.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1611-20. PubMed ID: 19403975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement of a wind-tunnel sampling system for odour and VOCs.
    Wang X; Jiang J; Kaye R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):71-7. PubMed ID: 11762486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the chemical-physical variables affecting the evaporation of organic compounds from aqueous solutions in a sampling wind tunnel.
    Invernizzi M; Bellini A; Miola R; Capelli L; Busini V; Sironi S
    Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 220():353-361. PubMed ID: 30590301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of odor concentration from mechanical-biological treatment piles using static chamber and wind tunnel with different wind speed values.
    Szyłak-Szydłowski M
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 28614044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization and control of odorous gases at a landfill site: a case study in Hangzhou, China.
    Ying D; Chuanyu C; Bin H; Yueen X; Xuejuan Z; Yingxu C; Weixiang W
    Waste Manag; 2012 Feb; 32(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 22137772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical-assisted design of a wind tunnel used in the estimation of volatilization from water, waste or soil.
    Baléo JN; Le Cloirec P
    Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 16583825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of odor emission rate from landfill areas using the sniffing team method.
    Nicolas J; Craffe F; Romain AC
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1259-69. PubMed ID: 16360313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference in the odor concentrations measured by the triangle odor bag method and dynamic olfactometry.
    Ueno H; Amano S; Merecka B; Kośmider J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1339-42. PubMed ID: 19380999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parameter sensitivity to concentrations and transport distance of odorous compounds from solid waste facilities.
    Chang H; Zhao Y; Tan H; Liu Y; Lu W; Wang H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 651(Pt 2):2158-2165. PubMed ID: 30326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of using multiple open-path Fourier transform infrared (OP-FTIR) spectrometers in an odor emission episode investigation at a semiconductor manufacturing plant.
    Tsao YC; Wu CF; Chang PE; Chen SY; Hwang YH
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Aug; 409(17):3158-65. PubMed ID: 21621818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a novel wind tunnel for the measurement of the kinetics of odour emissions from piggery effluent.
    Sohn JH; Smith R; Yoong E; Hudson N; Kim TI
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):49-55. PubMed ID: 15484742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Odor compounds from different sources of landfill: characterization and source identification.
    Fang JJ; Yang N; Cen DY; Shao LM; He PJ
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1401-10. PubMed ID: 22480726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two dynamic measurement methods of odor and odorant emission rates from freshly dewatered biosolids.
    Wang T; Sattayatewa C; Venkatesan D; Noll KE; Pagilla KR; Moschandreas DJ
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1746-52. PubMed ID: 21552636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aerodynamic performance of a low-speed wind tunnel.
    Frechen FB; Frey M; Wett M; Löser C
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 15484743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Odour sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices: a review.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):3993-4007. PubMed ID: 17512194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA; Dunlop M; Duperouzel D; Burrell D; Bell K; Gallagher E; Nicholas P; Heinrich N
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18625551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring of odor compounds produced by solid waste treatment plants with diffusive samplers.
    Bruno P; Caselli M; de Gennaro G; Solito M; Tutino M
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 16713237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterisation of odorants emissions from landfills by SPME and GC/MS.
    Davoli E; Gangai ML; Morselli L; Tonelli D
    Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(5):357-68. PubMed ID: 12598001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic air sampling of volatile organic compounds using solid phase microextraction.
    Razote E; Jeon I; Maghirang R; Chobpattana W
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2002 Jul; 37(4):365-78. PubMed ID: 12081028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.