These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22907450)

  • 1. Bayesian inference analysis of the uncertainty linked to the evaluation of potential flood damage in urban areas.
    Fontanazza CM; Freni G; Notaro V
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(8):1669-77. PubMed ID: 22907450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation.
    Freni G; La Loggia G; Notaro V
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):2979-93. PubMed ID: 20555194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flood risk modelling based on tangible and intangible urban flood damage quantification.
    ten Veldhuis JA; Clemens FH
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 20595770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian approach in estimating flood waste generation: A case study in South Korea.
    Park MH; Ju M; Kim JY
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110552. PubMed ID: 32292174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of rainfall data resolution in time and space on the urban flooding evaluation.
    Notaro V; Fontanazza CM; Freni G; Puleo V
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(9):1984-93. PubMed ID: 24225098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BK-SWMM flood simulation framework is being proposed for urban storm flood modeling based on uncertainty parameter crowdsourcing data from a single functional region.
    Liu C; Li W; Zhao C; Xie T; Jian S; Wu Q; Xu Y; Hu C
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118482. PubMed ID: 37413729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-probability flood risk modeling for New York City.
    Aerts JC; Lin N; Botzen W; Emanuel K; de Moel H
    Risk Anal; 2013 May; 33(5):772-88. PubMed ID: 23383711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainties of urban flood modeling: Influence of parameters for different underlying surfaces.
    Liu J; Shao W; Xiang C; Mei C; Li Z
    Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 182():108929. PubMed ID: 31855699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of parameter uncertainty for an activated sludge model using Bayesian inference: a comparison with the frequentist method.
    Zonta ZJ; Flotats X; Magrí A
    Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):1618-29. PubMed ID: 24956752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stormwater quality modelling in combined sewers: calibration and uncertainty analysis.
    Kanso A; Chebbo G; Tassin B
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):63-71. PubMed ID: 16206845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A benchmark methodology for managing uncertainties in urban runoff quality models.
    Kanso A; Tassin B; Chebbo G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 15790240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty and sensitivity of flood risk calculations for a dike ring in the south of the Netherlands.
    de Moel H; Bouwer LM; Aerts JC
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():224-34. PubMed ID: 24370697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty quantification of flood damage estimation for urban drainage risk management.
    Morita M; Tung YK
    Water Sci Technol; 2019 Aug; 80(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 31596259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A fully Bayesian multivariate approach to before-after safety evaluation.
    Park ES; Park J; Lomax TJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1118-27. PubMed ID: 20441821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncertainty evaluation of design rainfall for urban flood risk analysis.
    Fontanazza CM; Freni G; La Loggia G; Notaro V
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(11):2641-50. PubMed ID: 22049760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time forecasting urban drainage models: full or simplified networks?
    Leitão JP; Simões NE; Maksimović C; Ferreira F; Prodanović D; Matos JS; Sá Marques A
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21045338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flood analysis in mixed-urban areas reflecting interactions with the complete water cycle through coupled hydrologic-hydraulic modelling.
    Sto Domingo ND; Refsgaard A; Mark O; Paludan B
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1386-92. PubMed ID: 20861554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodology for qualitative urban flooding risk assessment.
    Leitão JP; Almeida Mdo C; Simões NE; Martins A
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):829-38. PubMed ID: 23985513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.