These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22908004)

  • 1. Sequential modulation of cue use in the task switching paradigm.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Reisenauer R; Jacobsen T; Dreisbach G
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():287. PubMed ID: 22908004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than Attentional Tuning - Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Practice Gains and Preparation in Task Switching.
    Wendt M; Klein S; Strobach T
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():682. PubMed ID: 28539893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responses to cued signals in Parkinson's disease. Distinguishing between disorders of cognition and of activation.
    Wascher E; Verleger R; Vieregge P; Jaskowski P; Koch S; Kömpf D
    Brain; 1997 Aug; 120 ( Pt 8)():1355-75. PubMed ID: 9278628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 20853997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.
    Karayanidis F; Mansfield EL; Galloway KL; Smith JL; Provost A; Heathcote A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 9(2):202-15. PubMed ID: 19403896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task preparation and neural activation in stimulus-specific brain regions: an fMRI study with the cued task-switching paradigm.
    Shi Y; Meindl T; Szameitat AJ; Müller HJ; Schubert T
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():39-51. PubMed ID: 24681435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects.
    Ansorge U; Gozli DG; Goller F
    Psychol Res; 2019 Sep; 83(6):1251-1268. PubMed ID: 29188426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.
    Mulckhuyse M; Crombez G
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1223-41. PubMed ID: 24467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task preparation and stimulus-evoked competition.
    Hübner M; Kluwe RH; Luna-Rodriguez A; Peters A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):211-34. PubMed ID: 14962401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context.
    Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability.
    Giessing C; Thiel CM; Rösler F; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2006 Feb; 137(3):853-64. PubMed ID: 16309846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of valid and invalid expectations about stimulus valence on behavioural and electrophysiological responses to emotional pictures.
    Johnen AK; Harrison NR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Oct; 144():47-55. PubMed ID: 31398378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task.
    Golob EJ; Pratt H; Starr A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Oct; 113(10):1544-57. PubMed ID: 12350430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inefficient cognitive control in adult ADHD: evidence from trial-by-trial Stroop test and cued task switching performance.
    King JA; Colla M; Brass M; Heuser I; von Cramon D
    Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Aug; 3():42. PubMed ID: 17708762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-Based Transition Expectancy in Task Switching: Do We Need to Know the Task to Switch to?
    Aufschnaiter S; Kiesel A; Thomaschke R
    J Cogn; 2021 Mar; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 33748664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1040-50. PubMed ID: 19744942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.