These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22908622)

  • 1. Regulating assisted reproductive technologies in Victoria: the impact of changing policy concerning the accessibility of in vitro fertilisation for preimplantation tissue-typing.
    Smith MK
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):820-34. PubMed ID: 22908622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a criminal model versus a professional model.
    Petersen K
    J Law Med; 2009 Dec; 17(3):452-61. PubMed ID: 20169804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewing regulation of assisted reproductive technology in New South Wales: the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW).
    Smith M
    J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 18807800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Problems with the regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a clinician's perspective.
    Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12194477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study of permissive and prescriptive laws and policies.
    Petersen K
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):483-97. PubMed ID: 12194479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: is there anything the United Kingdom can learn from the Australian experience?
    de Souza M
    J Law Med; 2012 Sep; 20(1):165-77. PubMed ID: 23156654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New assisted reproductive technology laws in Victoria: a genuine overhaul or just cut and paste?
    Thorpe R; Petersen K; Pitts MK; Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):835-50. PubMed ID: 21774278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of assisted reproductive technology in the Netherlands.
    te Braake TA
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):93-122. PubMed ID: 12656080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic technologies and the regulation of reproductive decision-making in Australia.
    Karpin I; Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16937786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulatory approaches to reproductive genetic testing.
    Knoppers BM; Isasi RM
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2695-701. PubMed ID: 15388677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symbiotic relationships: saviour siblings, family rights and biomedicine.
    Bennett B
    Aust J Fam Law; 2005 Dec; 19(3):195-212. PubMed ID: 17058348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Professional self-regulation and guidelines in assisted reproduction.
    Chalmers D
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):414-28. PubMed ID: 12194473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting "saviour siblings": reconsidering the regulation in Australia of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in conjunction with tissue typing.
    Taylor-Sands M
    J Law Med; 2007 May; 14(4):551-65. PubMed ID: 17571785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Discriminatory Legal Barrier of Partner Consent in Victorian ART Law: EHT18 v Melbourne IVF.
    Taylor-Sands MM
    Med Law Rev; 2019 Aug; 27(3):509-518. PubMed ID: 31006032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results and unsolved problems following the amendment to the Italian Law on assisted reproduction brought about by the Constitutional Court.
    Molinelli A; Bonsignore A; Darretta V; Anserini P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jul; 163(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 22483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Desperately seeking donors: the 'saviour sibling' decision in Quintavalle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (UK).
    Hocking BA; Guy S
    Aust J Fam Law; 2005 Aug; 19(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 17058339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioethical dilemmas of assisted reproduction in the opinions of Polish women in infertility treatment: a research report.
    Dembinska A
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 38(12):731-4. PubMed ID: 22977062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preimplantation diagnosis to create 'saviour siblings': a critical discussion of the current and future legal frameworks in South Africa.
    Strode A; Soni S
    S Afr Med J; 2011 Dec; 102(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 22273130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time for a national approach to donor conception in Australia.
    Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2011 Sep; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 21988005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technologies: professional and legal restrictions in Australian clinics.
    Petersen K; Baker HW; Pitts M; Thorpe R
    J Law Med; 2005 Feb; 12(3):373-85. PubMed ID: 15754559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.