These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22910753)

  • 1. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analysis plans in observational research.
    Trinh QD; Sun M
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical analysis plans in observational research--reply.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?
    Onukwugha E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.
    de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinician's perspective on a long time to publish.
    Peyrade F
    Lancet Haematol; 2017 Jan; 4(1):e11. PubMed ID: 27916631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designed Learning: Missing Data in Clinical Research.
    Stack CB; Butterworth T; Goldin R
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 May; 168(10):744. PubMed ID: 29632949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rethinking reanalysis.
    Christakis DA; Zimmerman FJ
    JAMA; 2013 Dec; 310(23):2499-500. PubMed ID: 24346985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical and clinical interpretation of research results.
    Allison GT
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17369326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
    Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research.
    Jannot AS; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23347853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study design and statistical analysis.
    Elston DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):207. PubMed ID: 29128448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Registration of observational studies does not enhance validity.
    Savitz DA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Nov; 90(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 22012311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [P value and confidence intervals: reporting and interpreting the result of a clinical study].
    Ravani P; Andrulli S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2006; 23(5):490-501. PubMed ID: 17123262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Documenting the methods history: would it improve the interpretability of studies?
    Krumholz HM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):418-9. PubMed ID: 22811497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.