These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22911526)

  • 1. A novel strategy for sibship determination in trio sibling model.
    Lee JC; Lin YY; Tsai LC; Lin CY; Huang TY; Chu PC; Yu YJ; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Croat Med J; 2012 Aug; 53(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 22911526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Detection Efficiency for Trio Full Sibling Testing.
    Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Yang JY; Wu RG; Sun HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):247-253. PubMed ID: 37517012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sibling assessment based on likelihood ratio and total number of shared alleles using 21 short tandem repeat loci included in the GlobalFiler™ kit.
    Inoue H; Manabe S; Fujii K; Iwashima Y; Miyama S; Tanaka A; Saitoh H; Iwase H; Tamaki K; Sekiguchi K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():122-6. PubMed ID: 26254055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Specificity of sibship determination using the ABI Identifiler multiplex system.
    Reid TM; Wolf CA; Kraemer CM; Lee SC; Baird ML; Lee RF
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Nov; 49(6):1262-4. PubMed ID: 15568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of sibship determination by using 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 18511010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing the confidence in half-sibship determination based upon 15 STR loci.
    Pu CE; Linacre A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Aug; 15(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 18586207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A grey zone approach for evaluation of 15 short tandem repeat loci in sibship analysis: a pilot study in Indian subjects.
    Giroti RI; Verma S; Singh K; Malik R; Talwar I
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2007 Jul; 14(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 17052943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases.
    Reid TM; Baird ML; Reid JP; Lee SC; Lee RF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 19083845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empowering sibship analyses with reference pedigrees.
    Wenk RE; Shao A
    Transfusion; 2012 Dec; 52(12):2614-9. PubMed ID: 22486247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined effects of multiple linked loci on pairwise sibling tests.
    Tamura T; Osawa M; Kakimoto Y; Ochiai E; Suzuki T; Nakamura T
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27878372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification Strategy of Biological Half Sibling Relationship.
    Tan Z; Ma GJ; Fu LH; Zhang XJ; Wang Q; Fu GP; DU QQ; Li SJ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):262-270. PubMed ID: 37517014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Trio Half Sibling Testing.
    Li HX; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Sun HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 37517013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risk of false inclusion of a relative in parentage testing - an in silico population study.
    Lee JC; Tsai LC; Chu PC; Lin YY; Lin CY; Huang TY; Yu YJ; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Croat Med J; 2013 Jun; 54(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23771756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pairwise kinship testing with a combination of STR and SNP loci.
    Zhang Q; Zhou Z; Wang L; Quan C; Liu Q; Tang Z; Liu L; Liu Y; Wang S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102265. PubMed ID: 32145445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The limitations of kinship determinations using STR data in ill-defined populations.
    Zvénigorosky V; Sabbagh A; Gonzalez A; Fausser JL; Palstra F; Romanov G; Solovyev A; Barashkov N; Fedorova S; Crubézy É; Ludes B; Keyser C
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 32318826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Microhaplotypes in Sibling Kinship Testing.
    Tang X; Wen D; Wang CD; Xu RY; Jia HT; Li JN; Zhalaga BY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):288-295. PubMed ID: 37517018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of Autosomal and Y-STR Markers in Establishing Sibling Relationship by DNA Genotyping.
    Dumache R; Ciocan V; Muresan C; Enache A
    Clin Lab; 2018 Jul; 64(7):1183-1192. PubMed ID: 30146844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency Analysis of Uncle-Nephew Relationship Identification by Increasing STR Markers and Adding Reference Samples.
    Kong QQ; Chen LQ; Li CT; Liu XL
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 38(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 36221831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
    Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.