These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22911762)

  • 1. Genetic variability of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) seed stands in Slovenia as revealed by nuclear microsatellite loci.
    Jarni K; De Cuyper B; Brus R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41231. PubMed ID: 22911762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of microsatellites in wild and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.)--markers for individual identification and reproductive processes.
    Schueler S; Tusch A; Schuster M; Ziegenhagen B
    Genome; 2003 Feb; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 12669801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular and quantitative signatures of biparental inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible tree species Prunus avium.
    Jolivet C; Rogge M; Degen B
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 May; 110(5):439-48. PubMed ID: 23211795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting local establishment strategies of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.).
    Höltken AM; Gregorius HR
    BMC Ecol; 2006 Oct; 6():13. PubMed ID: 17020607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prunus avium: nuclear DNA study in wild populations and sweet cherry cultivars.
    Guarino C; Santoro S; De Simone L; Cipriani G
    Genome; 2009 Apr; 52(4):320-37. PubMed ID: 19370088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polyploidy and microsatellite variation in the relict tree Prunus lusitanica L.: how effective are refugia in preserving genotypic diversity of clonal taxa?
    García-Verdugo C; Calleja JA; Vargas P; Silva L; Moreira O; Pulido F
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Mar; 22(6):1546-57. PubMed ID: 23379976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species -- Prunus avium L.
    Stoeckel S; Grange J; Fernández-Manjarres JF; Bilger I; Frascaria-Lacoste N; Mariette S
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2109-18. PubMed ID: 16780428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF SOME IRANIAN SWEET CHERRY (PRUNUS AVIUM) CULTIVARS USING MICROSATELLITE MARKERS AND MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS.
    Farsad A; Esna-Ashari M
    Tsitol Genet; 2016; 50(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 27266181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distribution and fine-scale spatial-genetic structure in British wild cherry (Prunus avium L.).
    Vaughan SP; Cottrell JE; Moodley DJ; Connolly T; Russell K
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 May; 98(5):274-83. PubMed ID: 17245421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between Chloroplast and Mitochondrial DNA sequences in Chinese Prunus genotypes (Prunus persica, Prunus domestica, and Prunus avium).
    Pervaiz T; Sun X; Zhang Y; Tao R; Zhang J; Fang J
    BMC Plant Biol; 2015 Jan; 15():4. PubMed ID: 25592231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of the within-population genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) at the self-incompatibility locus and nuclear microsatellites.
    Schueler S; Tusch A; Scholz F
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Oct; 15(11):3231-43. PubMed ID: 16968267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular characterisation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] SSR sequences.
    Wünsch A; Hormaza JI
    Heredity (Edinb); 2002 Jul; 89(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12080370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular analysis of East Anatolian traditional plum and cherry accessions using SSR markers.
    Öz MH; Vurgun H; Bakir M; Büyük İ; Yüksel C; Ünlü HM; Çukadar K; Karadoğan B; Köse Ö; Ergül A
    Genet Mol Res; 2013 Nov; 12(4):5310-20. PubMed ID: 24301792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population structure and genetic bottleneck in sweet cherry estimated with SSRs and the gametophytic self-incompatibility locus.
    Mariette S; Tavaud M; Arunyawat U; Capdeville G; Millan M; Salin F
    BMC Genet; 2010 Aug; 11():77. PubMed ID: 20727153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites.
    Godoy JA; Jordano P
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Sep; 10(9):2275-83. PubMed ID: 11555269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic diversity in wild sweet cherries (Prunus avium) in Turkey revealed by SSR markers.
    Ercisli S; Agar G; Yildirim N; Duralija B; Vokurka A; Karlidag H
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Jun; 10(2):1211-9. PubMed ID: 21732285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of microsatellite markers in peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.).
    Dirlewanger E; Cosson P; Tavaud M; Aranzana J; Poizat C; Zanetto A; Arús P; Laigret F
    Theor Appl Genet; 2002 Jul; 105(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 12582570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of a seed orchard of Eucalyptus dunnii based on genetic diversity criteria calculated using molecular markers.
    Marcucci Poltri SN; Zelener N; Rodriguez Traverso J; Gelid P; Hopp HE
    Tree Physiol; 2003 Jun; 23(9):625-32. PubMed ID: 12750055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple Sequence Repeat and S-locus Genotyping to Explore Genetic Variability in Polyploid Prunus spinosa and P. insititia.
    Halász J; Makovics-Zsohár N; Szőke F; Ercisli S; Hegedűs A
    Biochem Genet; 2017 Feb; 55(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27544205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in Ontario, Canada.
    Rajora OP; Rahman MH; Buchert GP; Dancik BP
    Mol Ecol; 2000 Mar; 9(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 10736031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.