196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22911882)
1. Breast scintigraphy with breast-specific γ-camera in the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: a correlation with mammography and histologic subtype.
Spanu A; Sanna D; Chessa F; Cottu P; Manca A; Madeddu G
J Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1528-33. PubMed ID: 22911882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Fishman M; Rapelyea JA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 17659240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical impact of breast scintigraphy acquired with a breast specific γ-camera (BSGC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer: incremental value versus mammography.
Spanu A; Sanna D; Chessa F; Manca A; Cottu P; Fancellu A; Nuvoli S; Madeddu G
Int J Oncol; 2012 Aug; 41(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 22641247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Menell JH; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Brogi E; Liberman L
Breast J; 2005; 11(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 16297080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; Oyama T; Koerner FC; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Breast J; 2001; 7(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 11843854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital mammography screening: association between detection rate and nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidinger O; Berkemeyer S; Hense HW
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24475843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.
Papantoniou V; Sotiropoulou E; Valsamaki P; Tsaroucha A; Sotiropoulou M; Ptohis N; Stipsanelli A; Dimitrakakis K; Marinopoulos S; Tsiouris S; Antsaklis A
Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20143189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and mammographic findings.
Zhang M; Lin Q; Su XH; Cui CX; Bian TT; Wang CQ; Zhao J; Li LL; Ma JZ; Huang JL
Clin Radiol; 2021 Oct; 76(10):787.e1-787.e7. PubMed ID: 34052010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Mammography Has Persistently Increased High-Grade and Overall DCIS Detection Without Altering Upgrade Rate.
Neal CH; Joe AI; Patterson SK; Pujara AC; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):912-918. PubMed ID: 33594910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Preoperative Breast MR Imaging and MR-guided Surgery on Diagnosis and Surgical Outcome of Women with Invasive Breast Cancer with and without DCIS Component.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Wardelmann E; Kuhn W; Maass N; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):645-655. PubMed ID: 28445683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project.
Evans A; Clements K; Maxwell A; Bishop H; Hanby A; Lawrence G; Pinder SE;
Clin Radiol; 2010 Mar; 65(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 20152272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.
Baur A; Bahrs SD; Speck S; Wietek BM; Krämer B; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Siegmann-Luz KC
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1731-7. PubMed ID: 23743052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme?
Kessar P; Perry N; Vinnicombe SJ; Hussain HK; Carpenter R; Wells CA
Clin Radiol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):807-14. PubMed ID: 12384106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive significance of breast-specific gamma imaging for upstaging core-needle biopsy-detected ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive cancer.
Yoo J; Kim BS; Yoon HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):328-336. PubMed ID: 29556944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided heterogeneity analysis in breast MR imaging assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlating histologic grade and receptor status.
Chou SS; Gombos EC; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS; Jayender J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1748-1759. PubMed ID: 28371110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
