172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22911937)
1. Breast imaging: is the sonographic descriptor of orientation valid for magnetic resonance imaging?
Oliveira TM; Brasileiro Sant'Anna TK; Mauad FM; Elias J; Muglia VF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22911937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
Fiaschetti V; Salimbeni C; Gaspari E; Dembele GK; Bolacchi F; Cossu E; Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Simonetti G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3178-84. PubMed ID: 22417393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of occult breast lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging with targeted ultrasound: a prospective study.
Aracava MM; Chojniak R; Souza JA; Bitencourt AG; Marques EF
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):516-9. PubMed ID: 24440492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.
Baltzer PA; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1658-63. PubMed ID: 20489110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
Gokalp G; Topal U; Kizilkaya E
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 18243623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Second-look US: how to find breast lesions with a suspicious MR imaging appearance.
Park VY; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ
Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1361-75. PubMed ID: 24025929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang L; Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Hua J; Wan CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24065262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging of fibrotic changes of breast disease: correlations between elastography findings and pathologic and short Tau inversion recovery imaging results, including the enhancement ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient.
Matsubayashi RN; Imanishi M; Nakagawa S; Takahashi R; Akashi M; Momosaki S; Muranaka T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25299798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Utility of Real-Time MR-Navigated Ultrasound with Supine Breast MRI for Suspicious Enhancing Lesions Not Identified on Second-Look Ultrasound.
Kang DK; Jung Y; Han S; Kim JY; Kim TH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):412-420. PubMed ID: 27780660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of second-look ultrasound examinations for MR-detected lesions in patients with breast cancer.
Lee SH; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun BL; Kang E; Kim SW; Park SY; Ahn HS; Chang JH; Yoo Y; Song TK; Moon WK
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Apr; 36(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 25750138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors.
Wilhelm A; McDonough MD; DePeri ER
Breast J; 2012; 18(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 23009294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
