172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22911937)
21. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast.
Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation.
Wang LC; DeMartini WB; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 19696298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast MRI in the evaluation of locally recurrent or new breast cancer in the postoperative patient: correlation of morphology and enhancement features with the BI-RADS category.
Seely JM; Nguyen ET; Jaffey J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Oct; 48(8):838-45. PubMed ID: 17851971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended.
Meissnitzer M; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1025-9. PubMed ID: 19770325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Malignant spiculated breast masses: dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation.
Gokalp G; Topal U; Yildirim N; Tolunay S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21236612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.
Caproni N; Marchisio F; Pecchi A; Canossi B; Battista R; D'Alimonte P; Torricelli P
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1384-95. PubMed ID: 20033178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?
Ballesio L; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Porfiri LM; D'Ambrosio I; Maggi C; Castro ED; Bennati P; Fanelli GP; Vestri AR; Manganaro L
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18479866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
Gokalp G; Topal U; Bolca N; Ercan I
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Gal Y; Mehnert A; Bradley A; Kennedy D; Crozier S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 21926864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses magnetic navigation, improves the sonographic identification of enhancing lesions on breast MRI.
Nakano S; Yoshida M; Fujii K; Yorozuya K; Kousaka J; Mouri Y; Fukutomi T; Ohshima Y; Kimura J; Ishiguchi T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 22137178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of focal breast lesions by means of elastography.
Fischer T; Sack I; Thomas A
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):816-23. PubMed ID: 23888477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings.
Abe H; Schmidt RA; Shah RN; Shimauchi A; Kulkarni K; Sennett CA; Newstead GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):370-7. PubMed ID: 20093598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering.
Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Frequency of Malignancy and Imaging Characteristics of Probably Benign Lesions Seen at Breast MRI.
Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):442-7. PubMed ID: 26204298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Kinetic characterization of non-mass lesions on breast MRI using manual and computer assisted methods.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S177-8. PubMed ID: 23083580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
