172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22911937)
41. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast.
Kurz KD; Roy S; Mödder U; Skaane P; Saleh A
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 19726148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?
Linda A; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Lorenzon M; Londero V; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 22268168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
Obenauer S; Dammert S
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Predictors of Malignancy in Hyperechoic Breast Lesions.
Nassar L; Issa G; Farah Z; El Zein Y; Berjawi G
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Apr; 35(4):783-90. PubMed ID: 26969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: multimodality imaging and histopathologic assessment.
Choi BB; Shu KS
Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 22090465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.
Zhang J; Lai XJ; Zhu QL; Wang HY; Jiang YX; Liu H; Dai Q; You SS; Xiao MS; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2179-83. PubMed ID: 21724355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Du J; Wang L; Wan CF; Hua J; Fang H; Chen J; Li FH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3890-9. PubMed ID: 23062280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.
Jales RM; Sarian LO; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23540948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening.
Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis.
Su Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Guo Y; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Tian J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e136-41. PubMed ID: 19913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Use of a Volume Navigation Technique for Combining Real-Time Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Accuracy and Feasibility of a Novel Technique for Locating Breast Lesions.
Kucukkaya F; Aribal E; Tureli D; Altas H; Kaya H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 26700355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification.
Costantini M; Belli P; Ierardi C; Franceschini G; La Torre G; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):877-94. PubMed ID: 17885742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric liver: benign and malignant masses.
Keup CP; Ratnaraj F; Chopra PR; Lawrence CA; Lowe LH
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Nov; 21(4):645-67. PubMed ID: 24183518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. 7 T versus 3T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experience.
Stehouwer BL; Klomp DW; Korteweg MA; Verkooijen HM; Luijten PR; Mali WP; van den Bosch MA; Veldhuis WB
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 31(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 23116848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.
Yoon H; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park BW; Kim MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):2099-107. PubMed ID: 25952162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
