These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22912430)

  • 1. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using nonmydriatic ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) compared with ETDRS 7-field stereo photography.
    Kernt M; Hadi I; Pinter F; Seidensticker F; Hirneiss C; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Neubauer AS
    Diabetes Care; 2012 Dec; 35(12):2459-63. PubMed ID: 22912430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diabetic retinopathy: comparison of the diagnostic features of ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy Optomap with ETDRS 7-field fundus photography].
    Kernt M; Pinter F; Hadi I; Hirneiss C; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Neubauer AS
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Feb; 108(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 20683601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonmydriatic screening for diabetic retinopathy by ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap).
    Neubauer AS; Kernt M; Haritoglou C; Priglinger SG; Kampik A; Ulbig MW
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 246(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 17622548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonmydriatic ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) versus two-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy.
    Liegl R; Liegl K; Ceklic L; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Kernt M; Neubauer AS
    Ophthalmologica; 2014; 231(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24247157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
    J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Widefield Laser Ophthalmoscopy and ETDRS Retinal Area for Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Ashraf M; Hock KM; Cavallerano JD; Wang FL; Silva PS
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2022 Dec; 2(4):100190. PubMed ID: 36531579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ETDRS grading with CLARUS ultra-widefield images shows agreement with 7-fields colour fundus photography.
    Santos AR; Ghate S; Lopes M; Rocha AC; Santos T; Reste-Ferreira D; Manivannan N; Foote K; Cunha-Vaz J
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):387. PubMed ID: 39227901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
    Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
    Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.
    Vujosevic S; Benetti E; Massignan F; Pilotto E; Varano M; Cavarzeran F; Avogaro A; Midena E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Maker MP; Noble J; Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Murtha TJ; Sun JK; Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 22385213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Standard 7-Field Imaging With Ultrawide-Field Imaging for Determining Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Aiello LP; Odia I; Glassman AR; Melia M; Jampol LM; Bressler NM; Kiss S; Silva PS; Wykoff CC; Sun JK;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 137(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 30347105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-field, two-field and five-field handheld retinal imaging compared with standard seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Salongcay RP; Jacoba CMP; Salva CMG; Rageh A; Aquino LAC; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Ashraf M; Peto T; Silva PS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 37094836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-mydriatic ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with dilated fundal examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in Chinese individuals with diabetes mellitus.
    Szeto SKH; Wong R; Lok J; Tang F; Sun Z; Tso T; Lam TCH; Tham CC; Ng DS; Cheung CY
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 103(9):1327-1331. PubMed ID: 30381391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.