These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22912430)

  • 21. Comparison of Handheld Retinal Imaging with ETDRS 7-Standard Field Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema.
    Salongcay RP; Aquino LAC; Salva CMG; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Sun JK; Peto T; Silva PS
    Ophthalmol Retina; 2022 Jul; 6(7):548-556. PubMed ID: 35278726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
    Islam FMA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New vessels detected on wide-field imaging compared to two-field and seven-field imaging: implications for diabetic retinopathy screening image analysis.
    Talks SJ; Manjunath V; Steel DH; Peto T; Taylor R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 99(12):1606-9. PubMed ID: 26271269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optomap ultrawide field imaging identifies additional retinal abnormalities in patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Price LD; Au S; Chong NV
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():527-31. PubMed ID: 25848202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic test accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by physician graders using a hand-held non-mydriatic retinal camera at a tertiary level medical clinic.
    Piyasena MMPN; Yip JLY; MacLeod D; Kim M; Gudlavalleti VSM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):89. PubMed ID: 30961576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Standard Imaging in Assessment of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale.
    Domalpally A; Barrett N; Reimers J; Blodi B
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100029. PubMed ID: 36249302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hemorrhage and/or Microaneurysm Severity and Count in Ultrawide Field Images and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Photography.
    Silva PS; El-Rami H; Barham R; Gupta A; Fleming A; van Hemert J; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):970-976. PubMed ID: 28336057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of 1-field, 2-fields, and 3-fields fundus photography for detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy.
    Lee JC; Nguyen L; Hynan LS; Blomquist PH
    J Diabetes Complications; 2019 Dec; 33(12):107441. PubMed ID: 31668742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
    Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nonmydriatic widefield retinal imaging with an automatic white LED confocal imaging system compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Borrelli E; Querques L; Lattanzio R; Cavalleri M; Grazioli Moretti A; Di Biase C; Signorino A; Gelormini F; Sacconi R; Bandello F; Querques G
    Acta Diabetol; 2020 Sep; 57(9):1043-1047. PubMed ID: 32246268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.
    Cavallerano JD; Aiello LP; Cavallerano AA; Katalinic P; Hock K; Kirby R; Aiello LM;
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 140(4):667-73. PubMed ID: 16083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema.
    Rudnisky CJ; Hinz BJ; Tennant MT; de Leon AR; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Feb; 109(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 11825807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems.
    Hirano T; Imai A; Kasamatsu H; Kakihara S; Toriyama Y; Murata T
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):332. PubMed ID: 30572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
    Verma A; Alagorie AR; Ramasamy K; van Hemert J; Yadav NK; Pappuru RR; Tufail A; Nittala MG; Sadda SR; Raman R;
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 258(4):725-733. PubMed ID: 31989286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG).
    Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 11484714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of quantitative assessment and efficiency of diabetic retinopathy diagnosis using ETDRS seven-field imaging and two ultra-widefield imaging.
    Xiao Y; Huang Z; Yuan Q; Du X; Li Z; Nie X; Shi Q; Dan H; Song Z
    Eye (Lond); 2023 Dec; 37(17):3558-3564. PubMed ID: 37120657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Perrier M; Boucher MC; Angioi K; Gresset JA; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 14740798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
    Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP
    Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of early diabetic retinopathy staging in asymptomatic patients between autonomous AI-based screening and human-graded ultra-widefield colour fundus images.
    Sedova A; Hajdu D; Datlinger F; Steiner I; Neschi M; Aschauer J; Gerendas BS; Schmidt-Erfurth U; Pollreisz A
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Mar; 36(3):510-516. PubMed ID: 35132211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.