159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22912945)
1. Uterine closure in cesarean delivery: a new technique.
Babu K; Magon N
N Am J Med Sci; 2012 Aug; 4(8):358-61. PubMed ID: 22912945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.
Yasmin S; Sadaf J; Fatima N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Sep; 21(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 21914406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
Sunkara S; Guan X
Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Stegwee SI; Jordans IPM; van der Voet LF; Bongers MY; de Groot CJM; Lambalk CB; de Leeuw RA; Hehenkamp WJK; van de Ven PM; Bosmans JE; Pajkrt E; Bakkum EA; Radder CM; Hemelaar M; van Baal WM; Visser H; van Laar JOEH; van Vliet HAAM; Rijnders RJP; Sueters M; Janssen CAH; Hermes W; Feitsma AH; Kapiteijn K; Scheepers HCJ; Langenveld J; de Boer K; Coppus SFPJ; Schippers DH; Oei ALM; Kaplan M; Papatsonis DNM; de Vleeschouwer LHM; van Beek E; Bekker MN; Huisjes AJM; Meijer WJ; Deurloo KL; Boormans EMA; van Eijndhoven HWF; Huirne JAF
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):85. PubMed ID: 30832681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online survey on uterotomy closure techniques in caesarean section.
Kaps C; Schwickert A; Dimitrova D; Nonnenmacher A; Siedentopf JP; Henrich W; Braun T
J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):809-817. PubMed ID: 34229368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.
Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Rodekamp E; Brauer M; Hinkson L; Kalache K; Henrich W
Ultraschall Med; 2018 Jun; 39(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 27626240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closure of the uterine incision with one or two layers after caesarean section: a randomized controlled study in sheep.
Lapointe-Milot K; Rizcallah E; Takser L; Abdelouahab N; Duvareille C; Pasquier JC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 May; 27(7):671-6. PubMed ID: 23952580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review.
Genovese F; Schiattarella A; D'Urso G; Vitale SG; Carugno J; Verzì G; D'Urso V; Iacono E; Siringo S; Leanza V; Palumbo M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 36724750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005.
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 16001462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study.
Hesselman S; Högberg U; Ekholm-Selling K; Råssjö EB; Jonsson M
BJOG; 2015 Oct; 122(11):1535-41. PubMed ID: 25088680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uterine scar rupture - Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management.
Tanos V; Toney ZA
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():115-131. PubMed ID: 30837118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
