These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22913161)

  • 1. Alarming rise of cesarean births: a single center experience.
    Simsek Y; Celen S; Ertas E; Danisman N; Mollamahmutoglu L
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Aug; 16(8):1102-6. PubMed ID: 22913161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can the rate of cesarean section be reduced?
    Mesleh RA; Kurdi AM; Ayoub HS
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Nov; 21(11):1054-8. PubMed ID: 11360068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Repeat cesarean section: a necessary procedure?].
    Lira Plascencia J; Tiscareño Barajas A; Duque Segundino Y; Coria Soto I; Zambrana Castañeda M; Ibargüengoitia Ochoa F; García-Benítez CQ
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 May; 68():218-23. PubMed ID: 10902291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trial of labor after one cesarean: role of the order and number of prior vaginal births on the risk of emergency cesarean delivery and neonatal admission.
    Tan PC; Subramaniam RN; Omar SZ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 47(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 18935994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?
    Gregory KD; Henry OA; Gellens AJ; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 8090395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Incidence and indication for cesarean section at the Central Military Hospital of Mexico].
    Olivares Morales AS; Santiago Ramirez JA; Cortes Ramirez P
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1996 Feb; 64():79-84. PubMed ID: 8714069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Declining cesarean section rates: a continuing trend?
    Millar WJ; Nair C; Wadhera S
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(1):17-24 (Eng); 17-24 (Fre). PubMed ID: 8844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section?
    Kottmel A; Hoesli I; Traub R; Urech C; Huang D; Leeners B; Tschudin S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jul; 286(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 22407124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of labor methods after cesarean sections in the last 50 years].
    Łatkowski K; Gryboś M; Blok R; Korzeniewski J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2003 Sep; 15(87):239-43. PubMed ID: 14679848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
    Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripartum hysterectomy and cesarean delivery: a population-based study.
    Stivanello E; Knight M; Dallolio L; Frammartino B; Rizzo N; Fantini MP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Mar; 89(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 20078253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.