1827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22913308)
1. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
Nunes LS; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and morphologic patterns in the atrophic posterior maxilla.
Monje A; Catena A; Monje F; Gonzalez-García R; Galindo-Moreno P; Suarez F; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2014 May; 85(5):676-82. PubMed ID: 24304226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the anatomy of the maxillary sinus septum using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Park YB; Jeon HS; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1070-8. PubMed ID: 21255895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic assessment of findings in the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography.
Dobele I; Kise L; Apse P; Kragis G; Bigestans A
Stomatologija; 2013; 15(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 24589634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
Maestre-Ferrín L; Galán-Gil S; Carrillo-García C; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 21483887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Palatonasal recess on medial wall of the maxillary sinus and clinical implications for sinus augmentation via lateral window approach.
Chan HL; Monje A; Suarez F; Benavides E; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23106503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Maxillary Sinus Septa Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Is There a Difference in Frequency and Type Between the Dentate and Edentulous Posterior Maxilla?
Schriber M; von Arx T; Sendi P; Jacobs R; Suter VG; Bornstein MM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1324-1332. PubMed ID: 29140376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early implant placement in bilateral sinus floor augmentation using iliac bone block grafts in severe maxillary atrophy: a clinical, histological, and radiographic case report.
Acocella A; Sacco R; Niardi P; Agostini T
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 19288886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique.
Leblebicioglu B; Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Tosun T; Gokdeniz H
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 15857072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 1-year cone beam computed tomography study.
Roe P; Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Caruso JM; Zimmerman G; Mesquida J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 22442780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.
Zhang W; Skrypczak A; Weltman R
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():65. PubMed ID: 26059796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Belser U; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 21491011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
