399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22913592)
1. Improving mapping and SNP-calling performance in multiplexed targeted next-generation sequencing.
Elsharawy A; Forster M; Schracke N; Keller A; Thomsen I; Petersen BS; Stade B; Stähler P; Schreiber S; Rosenstiel P; Franke A
BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():417. PubMed ID: 22913592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation of causes of false positive single nucleotide polymorphisms using simulated reads from a small eukaryote genome.
Ribeiro A; Golicz A; Hackett CA; Milne I; Stephen G; Marshall D; Flavell AJ; Bayer M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():382. PubMed ID: 26558718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One Size Doesn't Fit All - RefEditor: Building Personalized Diploid Reference Genome to Improve Read Mapping and Genotype Calling in Next Generation Sequencing Studies.
Yuan S; Johnston HR; Zhang G; Li Y; Hu YJ; Qin ZS
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004448. PubMed ID: 26267278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of variant calling tools for large plant genome re-sequencing.
Yao Z; You FM; N'Diaye A; Knox RE; McCartney C; Hiebert CW; Pozniak C; Xu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):360. PubMed ID: 32807073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generation of SNP datasets for orangutan population genomics using improved reduced-representation sequencing and direct comparisons of SNP calling algorithms.
Greminger MP; Stölting KN; Nater A; Goossens B; Arora N; Bruggmann R; Patrignani A; Nussberger B; Sharma R; Kraus RH; Ambu LN; Singleton I; Chikhi L; van Schaik CP; Krützen M
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():16. PubMed ID: 24405840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.
Zanti M; Michailidou K; Loizidou MA; Machattou C; Pirpa P; Christodoulou K; Spyrou GM; Kyriacou K; Hadjisavvas A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):218. PubMed ID: 33910496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SNP calling by sequencing pooled samples.
Raineri E; Ferretti L; Esteve-Codina A; Nevado B; Heath S; Pérez-Enciso M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():239. PubMed ID: 22992255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ComB: SNP calling and mapping analysis for color and nucleotide space platforms.
Souaiaia T; Frazier Z; Chen T
J Comput Biol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):795-807. PubMed ID: 21563978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population-based rare variant detection via pooled exome or custom hybridization capture with or without individual indexing.
Ramos E; Levinson BT; Chasnoff S; Hughes A; Young AL; Thornton K; Li A; Vallania FL; Province M; Druley TE
BMC Genomics; 2012 Dec; 13():683. PubMed ID: 23216810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens.
Liu J; Shen Q; Bao H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262574. PubMed ID: 35100292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Target enrichment sequencing in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using probes designed from transcript sequences.
Peng Z; Fan W; Wang L; Paudel D; Leventini D; Tillman BL; Wang J
Mol Genet Genomics; 2017 Oct; 292(5):955-965. PubMed ID: 28492983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.
Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP
Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications.
Rimmer A; Phan H; Mathieson I; Iqbal Z; Twigg SRF; ; Wilkie AOM; McVean G; Lunter G
Nat Genet; 2014 Aug; 46(8):912-918. PubMed ID: 25017105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ngs_backbone: a pipeline for read cleaning, mapping and SNP calling using next generation sequence.
Blanca JM; Pascual L; Ziarsolo P; Nuez F; Cañizares J
BMC Genomics; 2011 Jun; 12():285. PubMed ID: 21635747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
