BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22913637)

  • 1. Quantitative dimethyl sulfate mapping for automated RNA secondary structure inference.
    Cordero P; Kladwang W; VanLang CC; Das R
    Biochemistry; 2012 Sep; 51(36):7037-9. PubMed ID: 22913637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RNA Secondary Structure Study by Chemical Probing Methods Using DMS and CMCT.
    Alghoul F; Eriani G; Martin F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2300():241-250. PubMed ID: 33792883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interplay between molecular flexibility and RNA chemical probing reactivities analyzed at the nucleotide level via an extensive molecular dynamics study.
    Frezza E; Courban A; Allouche D; Sargueil B; Pasquali S
    Methods; 2019 Jun; 162-163():108-127. PubMed ID: 31145972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carbodiimide reagents for the chemical probing of RNA structure in cells.
    Wang PY; Sexton AN; Culligan WJ; Simon MD
    RNA; 2019 Jan; 25(1):135-146. PubMed ID: 30389828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization of RNA chemical mapping experiments.
    Kladwang W; Mann TH; Becka A; Tian S; Kim H; Yoon S; Das R
    Biochemistry; 2014 May; 53(19):3063-5. PubMed ID: 24766159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RNA secondary structure analysis of the packaging signal for Moloney murine leukemia virus.
    Alford RL; Honda S; Lawrence CB; Belmont JW
    Virology; 1991 Aug; 183(2):611-9. PubMed ID: 1853563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping RNA structure in vitro using nucleobase-specific probes.
    Sachsenmaier N; Handl S; Debeljak F; Waldsich C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1086():79-94. PubMed ID: 24136599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling and automation of sequencing-based characterization of RNA structure.
    Aviran S; Trapnell C; Lucks JB; Mortimer SA; Luo S; Schroth GP; Doudna JA; Arkin AP; Pachter L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jul; 108(27):11069-74. PubMed ID: 21642536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the errors of SHAPE-directed RNA structure modeling.
    Kladwang W; VanLang CC; Cordero P; Das R
    Biochemistry; 2011 Sep; 50(37):8049-56. PubMed ID: 21842868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemical Probing of RNA Structure In Vivo Using SHAPE-MaP and DMS-MaP.
    Saha K; Ghosh G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2666():81-93. PubMed ID: 37166658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-wide probing RNA structure with the modified DMS-MaPseq in Arabidopsis.
    Wang Z; Wang M; Wang T; Zhang Y; Zhang X
    Methods; 2019 Feb; 155():30-40. PubMed ID: 30503825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutation signature filtering enables high-fidelity RNA structure probing at all four nucleobases with DMS.
    Mitchell D; Cotter J; Saleem I; Mustoe AM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Sep; 51(16):8744-8757. PubMed ID: 37334863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical secondary structure probing of two highly methylated regions in Xenopus laevis 28S ribosomal RNA.
    Ajuh PM; Maden EB
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 1994 Sep; 1219(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 8086482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving RNA secondary structure prediction with structure mapping data.
    Sloma MF; Mathews DH
    Methods Enzymol; 2015; 553():91-114. PubMed ID: 25726462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nucleotides in 16S rRNA protected by the association of 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits.
    Merryman C; Moazed D; McWhirter J; Noller HF
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jan; 285(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 9878391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new reagent for in vivo structure probing of RNA G and U residues that improves RNA structure prediction alone and combined with DMS.
    Douds CA; Babitzke P; Bevilacqua PC
    RNA; 2024 Jun; 30(7):901-919. PubMed ID: 38670632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated RNA structure prediction uncovers a kink-turn linker in double glycine riboswitches.
    Kladwang W; Chou FC; Das R
    J Am Chem Soc; 2012 Jan; 134(3):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22192063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Secondary structure models of the 3' untranslated regions of diverse R2 RNAs.
    Ruschak AM; Mathews DH; Bibillo A; Spinelli SL; Childs JL; Eickbush TH; Turner DH
    RNA; 2004 Jun; 10(6):978-87. PubMed ID: 15146081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RNA Remodeling by RNA Chaperones Monitored by RNA Structure Probing.
    Friedrich S; Schmidt T; Behrens SE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2106():179-192. PubMed ID: 31889258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down characterization of nucleic acids modified by structural probes using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry and automated data interpretation.
    Kellersberger KA; Yu E; Kruppa GH; Young MM; Fabris D
    Anal Chem; 2004 May; 76(9):2438-45. PubMed ID: 15117181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.