These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22914476)
21. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only? Bazzelle RY Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bargaining with Hippocrates: managed care and the doctor-patient relationship. Hall TS S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(3):689-740. PubMed ID: 15214354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The fiduciary obligation of physicians to "just say no" if an "informed" patient demands services that are not medically indicated. Hafemeister TL; Gulbrandsen RM Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(2):335-86. PubMed ID: 19462539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood. Brauer S Med Health Care Philos; 2016 Mar; 19(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25837233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion. Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine. Bloche MG N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Protecting patient-doctor discourse: informed consent and deliberative autonomy. Gatter KM Oregon Law Rev; 1999; 78(4):941-93. PubMed ID: 12666672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Should all pregnant women have an ultrasound examination? Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 4(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 12797175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Coercing Women's Behavior: How a Mandatory Viewing Law Changes Patients' Preabortion Ultrasound Viewing Practices. Kimport K; Johns NE; Upadhyay UD J Health Polit Policy Law; 2018 Dec; 43(6):941-960. PubMed ID: 31091323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Counseling, consulting, and consent: abortion and the doctor-patient relationship. Wood MA; Durham WC Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1978; 1978(4):783-845. PubMed ID: 11664994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests. Jones CJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Adolescent abortion and mandated parental involvement. Johannsen L Pediatr Nurs; 1995; 21(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 7715978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe. Manninen BA Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Physician gag clauses--the hypocrisy of the Hippocratic Oath. Swanson DS South Ill Univ Law J; 1997; 21():313-34. PubMed ID: 16086489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]