160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22915238)
1. Can we always trust in the computer? Adequate tibial alignment and flexion-gap balancing using personalised knee arthroplasty cutting blocks.
Kastner N; Gruber G; Sadoghi P
Int Orthop; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2395. PubMed ID: 22915238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Jerabek SA; Haughom B; Cross MB; Reinhardt KR; Mayman DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1527-33. PubMed ID: 21397455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Patient Specific Instruments. To measure is to know!
Delport HP; Vander Sloten J
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Apr; 30(4):720-1. PubMed ID: 25498956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1285-90. PubMed ID: 21316913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system.
Seo SS; Seo JH; Sohn MW; Kim YJ
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):50-5. PubMed ID: 23026253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Hiscox CM; Bohm ER; Turgeon TR; Hedden DR; Burnell CD
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1259-64. PubMed ID: 21592721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks.
Dao Trong ML; Diezi C; Goerres G; Helmy N
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Jul; 23(7):1993-8. PubMed ID: 24435223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the position of the fibular head after implantation of a total knee prosthesis on femorotibial rotation.
Matziolis G; Pfitzner T; Thiele K; Matziolis D; Perka C
Orthopedics; 2011 Oct; 34(10):e610-4. PubMed ID: 21956054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation.
Kerens B; Leenders AM; Schotanus MGM; Boonen B; Tuinebreijer WE; Emans PJ; Jong B; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29282486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do spacer blocks accurately estimate deformity correction and gap balance in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective study with computer navigation.
Jhurani A; Agarwal P; Aswal M; Meena I; Srivastava M; Sheth NP
Knee; 2020 Jan; 27(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 31918963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Total knee arthroplasty. Patient-specific instruments and implants].
Steinert AF; Holzapfel BM; Sefrin L; Arnholdt J; Hoberg M; Rudert M
Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27025870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a review.
Ast MP; Nam D; Haas SB
Orthop Clin North Am; 2012 Nov; 43(5):e17-22. PubMed ID: 23102417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cadaveric results of an accelerometer based, extramedullary navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Dy CJ; Cross MB; Kang MN; Mayman DJ
Knee; 2012 Oct; 19(5):617-21. PubMed ID: 22032868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthesis alignment affects axial rotation motion after total knee replacement: a prospective in vivo study combining computed tomography and fluoroscopic evaluations.
Harman MK; Banks SA; Kirschner S; Lützner J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():206. PubMed ID: 23088451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of custom cutting guides based on three-dimensional computerized CT-scan planning and a conventional ancillary system based on two-dimensional planning in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Sariali E; Kajetanek C; Catonné Y
Int Orthop; 2019 Nov; 43(11):2529-2538. PubMed ID: 31227853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial.
De Vloo R; Pellikaan P; Dhollander A; Vander Sloten J
Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 28943039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plain radiograph fails to reflect the alignment and advantages of navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Choi WC; Lee S; An JH; Kim D; Seong SC; Lee MC
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 20875940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The MyKnee® patient-specific system. Rationale, Technique and Results].
Anderl W; Pauzenberger L; Schwameis E
Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 27025868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of a reconstructed three-dimensional solid model from CT to aid the surgical management of a total knee arthroplasty: a case study.
Minns RJ; Bibb R; Banks R; Sutton RA
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jul; 25(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 12787991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique.
Koch PP; Müller D; Pisan M; Fucentese SF
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Oct; 21(10):2200-5. PubMed ID: 23942882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
