145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22915433)
1. Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade.
Blaichman J; Marcus JC; Alsaadi T; El-Khoury M; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W402-8. PubMed ID: 22915433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging differences in metaplastic and invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast.
Yang WT; Hennessy B; Broglio K; Mills C; Sneige N; Davis WG; Valero V; Hunt KK; Gilcrease MZ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1288-93. PubMed ID: 18029860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound characteristics of histologically proven grade 3 invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Rotstein AH; Neerhut PK
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 16351611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of sonographic features of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumor grade, and hormone-receptor status.
Aho M; Irshad A; Ackerman SJ; Lewis M; Leddy R; Pope TL; Campbell AS; Cluver A; Wolf BJ; Cunningham JE
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Jan; 41(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 22996916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic, sonographic and MR imaging features of invasive micropapillary breast cancer.
Alsharif S; Daghistani R; Kamberoğlu EA; Omeroglu A; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1375-80. PubMed ID: 24913934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic appearance of mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Lam WW; Chu WC; Tse GM; Ma TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):1069-74. PubMed ID: 15039190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic appearances of juvenile fibroadenoma of the breast.
Kim SJ; Park YM; Jung SJ; Lee KH; Kim OH; Ryu JH; Choi GB; Lee SJ; Choo HJ; Jeong HW
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1879-84. PubMed ID: 25336474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic features of invasive ductal breast carcinomas predictive of malignancy grade.
Gupta K; Kumaresan M; Venkatesan B; Chandra T; Patil A; Menon M
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2018; 28(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 29692540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses.
Kim SJ; Morris EA; Liberman L; Ballon DJ; La Trenta LR; Hadar O; Abramson A; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 11517046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with large central acellular zones (ring carcinoma): imaging and clinical findings in eight cases.
Connors AM; Svensson WE; Sinnett HD; Shousha S
Breast; 2005 Oct; 14(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 16216748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Lamb PM; Perry NM; Vinnicombe SJ; Wells CA
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 10650109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic value of automated breast volume scanner in high-risk and small breast lesions].
Su KL; Xu HB; Zhang ZX; Pan N; He JL; Hu ZJ; Yang OO; Luo H; Yang HF; Liu LL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 35(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 24332060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic and ultrasonographic features of triple-negative breast cancer: a comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
Kim MY; Choi N
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 23761558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients.
Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Khetani K; Abdullah N; Joseph L; Kao E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 19414087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flat epithelial atypia of the breast: pathological-radiological correlation.
Solorzano S; Mesurolle B; Omeroglu A; El Khoury M; Kao E; Aldis A; Meterissian S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):740-6. PubMed ID: 21862819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors.
Kim JA; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Jeong J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1450-6. PubMed ID: 21606313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
