These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22915506)
1. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. Sladkevicius P; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement in describing the ultrasound appearance of adnexal masses and in calculating the risk of malignancy using logistic regression models. Sladkevicius P; Valentin L Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Feb; 21(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 25424853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers. Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips. Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help. Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX model: Portuguese multicenter study. Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 64(4):538-549. PubMed ID: 38477149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of assessment of Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses. Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 42(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 23065868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting. Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study. Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the reproducibility of the IOTA simple ultrasound rules for classifying adnexal masses as benign or malignant using stored 3D volumes. Guerriero S; Saba L; Ajossa S; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Alcázar JL Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 24060210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods. Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses? Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses. Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement. Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional volume off-line analysis as compared to real-time ultrasound for assessing adnexal masses. Alcázar JL; Iturra A; Sedda F; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Guerriero S; Jurado M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 22197306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]