These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2291580)

  • 1. Field comparison of personal samplers for inhalable dust.
    Vaughan NP; Chalmers CP; Botham RA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1990 Dec; 34(6):553-73. PubMed ID: 2291580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct-reading inhalable dust monitoring--an assessment of current measurement methods.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Aug; 57(7):824-41. PubMed ID: 23704135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry.
    de Vocht F; Huizer D; Prause M; Jakobsson K; Peplonska B; Straif K; Kromhout H
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2006 Sep; 79(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 16506045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds.
    Sleeth DK; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 21985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
    Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
    Anthony TR; Cai C; Mehaffy J; Sleeth D; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction of sampler-to-sampler comparisons based on aerosol size distribution.
    O'Shaughnessy PT; Lo J; Golla V; Nakatsu J; Tillery MI; Reynolds S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Apr; 4(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 17365494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Side-by-side determination of workers' exposure to wood dust with IOM and open-faced samplers.
    Cavlović AO; Beljo Lučić R; Jug M; Radmanović K; Bešlić I
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 24084346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure.
    Campopiano A; Basili F; Angelosanto F; Cannizzaro A; Olori A; Ramires D; Iannò A; Angelici L
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27373902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler.
    Aizenberg V; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K; Smith J; Baron PA
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 10885891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of an inhalable and a total dust sampler for personal sampling of dust and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the gas and particulate phase.
    Notø H; Halgard K; Daae HL; Bentsen RK; Eduard W
    Analyst; 1996 Sep; 121(9):1191-6. PubMed ID: 8831276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A wind tunnel test of newly developed personal bioaerosol samplers.
    Su WC; Tolchinsky AD; Sigaev VI; Cheng YS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jul; 62(7):828-37. PubMed ID: 22866584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries.
    Harper M; Muller BS
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.