These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917106)

  • 1. Involuntary experiencing and the performance of hypnotic test suggestions.
    Cunningham PF; Ramos P
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2012; 60(4):416-31. PubMed ID: 22917106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypnotizability, sleepiness, and subjective experience.
    Móró L; Noreika V; Revonsuo A; Kallio S
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Apr; 59(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21390980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Kirsch I; Council JR; Wickless C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 2347668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making hypnosis happen: the involuntariness of the hypnotic experience.
    Zamansky HS; Ruehle BL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Oct; 43(4):386-98. PubMed ID: 7591340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses.
    Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between memory, suggestibility and hypnotic responsivity.
    Eisen ML
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Oct; 39(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 8936713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies.
    Meyer EC; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):327-49. PubMed ID: 21644124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: accuracy of self-report and the memory for items.
    Younger J; Kemmerer DD; Winkel JD; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Jul; 53(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 16076667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polish norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Siuta J
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2010 Oct; 58(4):433-43. PubMed ID: 20799122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypnosis, suggestion type, and subjective experience--the order-effects hypothesis revisited: a brief communication.
    Weekes JR; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 2347670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the hypnotic experience between signing deaf and hearing participants.
    Matthews WJ; Isenberg GL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Oct; 43(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 7591339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in body attitude as a function of posthypnotic suggestions.
    Van Denburg EJ; Kurtz RM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Jan; 37(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 2925291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hypnotizability, the dissociative experiences scale, HGSHS: A amnesia, and automatic writing: is there an association?
    Green JP
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jan; 45(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 8991297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure of communication and reports of involuntariness by hypnotic and nonhypnotic subjects.
    Spanos NP; De Groh M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Dec; 57(3 Pt 2):1179-86. PubMed ID: 6664796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UNITED KINGDOM NORMS FOR THE HARVARD GROUP SCALE OF HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY, FORM A.
    Oakley DA; Walsh E; Lillelokken AM; Halligan PW; Mehta MA; Deeley Q
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2020; 68(1):80-104. PubMed ID: 31914370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Durability of posthypnotic suggestions: type of suggestion and difficulty level.
    Trussell JE; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jul; 39(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 8917929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review.
    Lynn SJ; Neufeld V; Maré C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):124-52. PubMed ID: 8468104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taxometric evidence for a dimensional latent structure of hypnotic suggestibility.
    Reshetnikov M; Terhune DB
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Feb; 98():103269. PubMed ID: 35065351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involuntariness of response on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility.
    Farthing GW; Brown SW; Venturino M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1983 Jul; 31(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 6862718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Volitional and Nonvolitional Responses to Hypnotic Suggestions: Predictors and Subjective Experience.
    Mohl JC; Schutkofsky MJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2017 Apr; 59(4):393-413. PubMed ID: 28300521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.