BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917114)

  • 1. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials.
    Monje A; Chan HL; Fu JH; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 84(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 22917114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Monje A; Fu JH; Chan HL; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1783-91. PubMed ID: 23451988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.
    Ortega-Oller I; Suárez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Torrecillas-Martínez L; Monje A; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 85(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 23905841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
    Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.
    Karabuda ZC; Abdel-Haq J; Arisan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):840-9. PubMed ID: 21198901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants.
    Carr AB; Choi YG; Eckert SE; Desjardins RP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 12814315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
    Balshe AA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Assad DA; Weaver AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1117-22. PubMed ID: 19216282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term survival of calcium phosphate-coated dental implants: a meta-analytical approach to the clinical literature.
    van Oirschot BA; Bronkhorst EM; van den Beucken JJ; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA; Junker R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 23126337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
    Balshe AA; Assad DA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Weaver AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with failure of surface-modified implants up to four years of function.
    Cosyn J; Vandenbulcke E; Browaeys H; Van Maele G; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):347-58. PubMed ID: 20491819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of turned and roughened dental implants in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
    Buddula A; Assad DA; Salinas TJ; Garces YI; Volz JE; Weaver AL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 22024178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.
    Lambert FE; Weber HP; Susarla SM; Belser UC; Gallucci GO
    J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1220-30. PubMed ID: 19656021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.
    Strietzel FP; Reichart PA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience.
    Attard NJ; Zarb GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 12690347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 5-year prospective multicenter clinical trial of non-submerged dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface in 200 patients.
    Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Jones AA; Jones JD; Kaiser DA; Taylor TD; Weber HP; Higginbottom FL; Richardson JR; Oates T
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):990-9. PubMed ID: 21235337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A noninterventional study documenting use and success of implants with a new chemically modified titanium surface in daily dental practice.
    Luongo G; Oteri G
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 20735267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
    Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.