187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917114)
21. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up.
Weng D; Jacobson Z; Tarnow D; Hürzeler MB; Faehn O; Sanavi F; Barkvoll P; Stach RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 12814318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: a 12-year life-table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants.
Ferrigno N; Laureti M; Fanali S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 16584416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review.
Lee JJ; Rouhfar L; Beirne OR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1372-9; discussion 1379-80. PubMed ID: 11117685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In selected sites, short, rough-surfaced dental implants are as successful as long dental implants: a critical summary of Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(9):856-863.
Balevi B
J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 23372136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis.
Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Vazouras K; Gholami H; Pagni S; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():8-20. PubMed ID: 30328206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preliminary data of a prospective clinical study on the Osseotite NT implant: 18-month follow-up.
Davarpanah M; Caraman M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Jakubowicz-Kohen B; Alcolforado G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15973957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review.
Sohrabi K; Mushantat A; Esfandiari S; Feine J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 22313216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.
Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.
Al-Nawas B; Hangen U; Duschner H; Krummenauer F; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17535330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective clinical evaluation of 835 multithreaded tapered screw-vent implants: results after two years of functional loading.
Khayat PG; Milliez SN
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 17912964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective clinical trial of dental implants in persons with ectodermal dysplasia.
Guckes AD; Scurria MS; King TS; McCarthy GR; Brahim JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12239475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Periodontal disease as a risk for dental implant failure over time: a long-term historical cohort study.
Levin L; Ofec R; Grossmann Y; Anner R
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):732-7. PubMed ID: 21635280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Freestanding and multiunit immediate loading of the expandable implant: an up-to-40-month prospective survival study.
Jo HY; Hobo PK; Hobo S
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 11208204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study.
Anitua E; Orive G; Aguirre JJ; Andía I
J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18166091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.
Cochran D; Oates T; Morton D; Jones A; Buser D; Peters F
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 17539708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.
Romeo E; Ghisolfi M; Rozza R; Chiapasco M; Lops D
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 17165298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
