These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917114)

  • 61. Survival of dental implants in bisphosphonate users versus non-users: a systematic review.
    Kumar MN; Honne T
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 20(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 23495556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Dental Implant Length and Diameter: A Proposed Classification Scheme.
    Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Alsaeed S; Alalola B
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):252-260. PubMed ID: 27379723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The Impact of Dental Implant Length on Failure Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Abdel-Halim M; Issa D; Chrcanovic BR
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 34300891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Experience with the use of short dental implants in the literature].
    Vajdovich I; Orosz M
    Fogorv Sz; 2015 Jun; 108(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 26434205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Implants Today Section Debut.
    Adams D
    Dent Today; 2015 Sep; 34(9):6. PubMed ID: 26480623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Expandable short dental implants seem to have an acceptable rate of success after 3 years.
    Brignardello-Petersen R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Apr; 149(4):e73. PubMed ID: 29395007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Section Editor High Impact Articles - Dental Implants.
    Block MS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):e15. PubMed ID: 32616220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Dental implants are contraindicated in...
    Osswald M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1024-7. PubMed ID: 25353037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Dental implants.
    Mohammad S
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2017; 8(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 29386808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. "Booby-Trap" - Dental implants at bay.
    Anil S
    Saudi Dent J; 2010 Jul; 22(3):99-100. PubMed ID: 23960482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Dental implants.
    Elias CN; Coelho PG
    Int J Biomater; 2013; 2013():838565. PubMed ID: 23476650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Monje A; Fu JH; Chan HL; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1783-91. PubMed ID: 23451988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Monje A; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; García-Nogales A; Fu JH; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1119-24. PubMed ID: 23937287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Schincaglia GP; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25418606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.
    Ortega-Oller I; Suárez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Torrecillas-Martínez L; Monje A; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 85(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 23905841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Four-Millimeter-Long Posterior-Mandible Implants: 5-Year Outcomes of a Prospective Multicenter Study.
    Slotte C; Grønningsaeter A; Halmøy AM; Öhrnell LO; Mordenfeld A; Isaksson S; Johansson LÅ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e385-95. PubMed ID: 25041489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Long-term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10-12 years.
    Anitua E; Piñas L; Begoña L; Orive G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 41(4):404-11. PubMed ID: 24354567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Short implants in maxillary and mandibular rehabilitations: interim results (6 to 42 months) of a prospective study.
    Taschieri S; Corbella S; Molinari R; Saita M; Del Fabbro M
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23413769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.