These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917185)

  • 1. CDS: a fold-change based statistical test for concomitant identification of distinctness and similarity in gene expression analysis.
    Tchitchek N; Dzib JF; Targat B; Noth S; Benecke A; Lesne A
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 10(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 22917185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting FDR analogous confidence intervals for the log fold change of differentially expressed genes.
    Jung K; Friede T; Beissbarth T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 12():288. PubMed ID: 21756370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Models for microarray gene expression data.
    Lee ML; Lu W; Whitmore GA; Beier D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Feb; 12(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12146717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying temporally differentially expressed genes through functional principal components analysis.
    Liu X; Yang MC
    Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):667-79. PubMed ID: 19602570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genome-scale cluster analysis of replicated microarrays using shrinkage correlation coefficient.
    Yao J; Chang C; Salmi ML; Hung YS; Loraine A; Roux SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 9():288. PubMed ID: 18564431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rank Difference Analysis of Microarrays (RDAM), a novel approach to statistical analysis of microarray expression profiling data.
    Martin DE; Demougin P; Hall MN; Bellis M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 5():148. PubMed ID: 15476558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies using information from public databases.
    Kim RD; Park PJ
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(9):R70. PubMed ID: 15345054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the statistical detection of regulated genes from microarray data using intensity-based variance estimation.
    Comander J; Natarajan S; Gimbrone MA; García-Cardeña G
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):17. PubMed ID: 15113402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new efficient statistical test for detecting variability in the gene expression data.
    Mathur S; Dolo S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Aug; 17(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 17698928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The analysis of microarray data.
    Hariharan R
    Pharmacogenomics; 2003 Jul; 4(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 12831325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical analysis of differential gene expression relative to a fold change threshold on NanoString data of mouse odorant receptor genes.
    Vaes E; Khan M; Mombaerts P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 15():39. PubMed ID: 24495268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Covariance thresholding to detect differentially co-expressed genes from microarray gene expression data.
    Oh M; Kim K; Sun H
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Feb; 18(1):2050002. PubMed ID: 32336254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic comparison of microarray profiling, real-time PCR, and next-generation sequencing technologies for measuring differential microRNA expression.
    Git A; Dvinge H; Salmon-Divon M; Osborne M; Kutter C; Hadfield J; Bertone P; Caldas C
    RNA; 2010 May; 16(5):991-1006. PubMed ID: 20360395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Laplace mixture model for identification of differential expression in microarray experiments.
    Bhowmick D; Davison AC; Goldstein DR; Ruffieux Y
    Biostatistics; 2006 Oct; 7(4):630-41. PubMed ID: 16565148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcription profiling of benign and malignant adrenal tumors by cDNA macro-array analysis.
    De Fraipont F; Le Moigne G; Defaye G; El Atifi M; Berger F; Houlgatte R; Gicquel C; Plouin PF; Bertagna X; Chabre O; Feige JJ
    Endocr Res; 2002 Nov; 28(4):785-6. PubMed ID: 12530698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling false discoveries in multidimensional directional decisions, with applications to gene expression data on ordered categories.
    Guo W; Sarkar SK; Peddada SD
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 19645703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arrow plot: a new graphical tool for selecting up and down regulated genes and genes differentially expressed on sample subgroups.
    Silva-Fortes C; Amaral Turkman MA; Sousa L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13():147. PubMed ID: 22734592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.