250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917443)
1. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posttreatment diagnosis of caries under fixed restorations: a pilot study.
Bilgin MS; Aglarci OS; Erdem A
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1364-9. PubMed ID: 25218033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection in the presence of different dental restoration materials.
Mosavat F; Ahmadi E; Amirfarhangi S; Rafeie N
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 37353807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of different dental restorations on detection of proximal caries by cone beam computed tomography.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Abou El-Fotouh M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2413-2420. PubMed ID: 34601634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical angulation of the X-ray beam and radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries.
Tveit AB; Espelid I; Erickson RL; Glasspoole EA
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1991 Dec; 19(6):333-5. PubMed ID: 1837258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The visibility of secondary caries under bonding agents with two different imaging modalities.
Kurşun Ş; Dinç G; Oztaş B; Yüksel S; Kamburoğlu K
Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(6):975-9. PubMed ID: 23207203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries.
Matteson SR; Phillips C; Kantor ML; Leinedecker T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2674831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
