252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22917443)
21. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiographic detection of artificially created horizontal root fracture using different cone beam CT units with small fields of view.
Kamburoglu K; Onder B; Murat S; Avsever H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(4):20120261. PubMed ID: 23420851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kursun S
Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.
Krzyżostaniak J; Kulczyk T; Czarnecka B; Surdacka A
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of the number of iterative restorations on tuned aperture computed tomography for approximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 11641731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study.
Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15124784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.
Kayipmaz S; Sezgin ÖS; Saricaoğlu ST; Çan G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 20934291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries.
Şeker O; Kamburoğlu K; Şahin C; Eratam N; Çakmak EE; Sönmez G; Özen D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20210026. PubMed ID: 33979235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of various cone-beam computed tomography settings on the detection of recurrent caries under restorations in extracted primary teeth.
Kamburoğlu K; Sönmez G; Berktaş ZS; Kurt H; Özen D
Imaging Sci Dent; 2017 Jun; 47(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 28680847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
