These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22918151)

  • 1. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.
    Reddy RK; Welch D; Thorne P; Ameratunga S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):202-9. PubMed ID: 22918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the hearing protection assessment (HPA-2) questionnaire.
    Reddy R; Welch D; Ameratunga S; Thorne P
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Apr; 64(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 24514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of Hearing Protection Use Among Industrial Workers.
    Tantranont K; Codchanak N
    Workplace Health Saf; 2017 Aug; 65(8):365-371. PubMed ID: 28422611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception and attitudes of firefighters on noise exposure and hearing loss.
    Hong O; Samo D; Hulea R; Eakin B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 18213534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers.
    Lusk SL; Kerr MJ; Kauffman SA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Jul; 59(7):466-70. PubMed ID: 9697294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of the adjustment of retrospective noise exposure for use of hearing protection devices.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 20237208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers--NHANES, 1999-2004.
    Tak S; Davis RR; Calvert GM
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 May; 52(5):358-71. PubMed ID: 19267354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kazanis AS; Eakin BL; Hong O; Raymond DM
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 14501543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise exposure of workers and the use of hearing protection equipment in New Zealand.
    John GW; Grynevych A; Welch D; McBride D; Thorne PR
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2014; 69(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 24205958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early occupational hearing loss of workers in a stone crushing industry: our experience in a developing country.
    Kitcher ED; Ocansey G; Tumpi DA
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(57):68-71. PubMed ID: 22517306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
    Hager LD
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of permanent hearing threshold shift among workers of Indian iron and steel small and medium enterprises: a study.
    Singh LP; Bhardwaj A; Kumar DK
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(58):119-28. PubMed ID: 22718110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
    Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational exposure in small and medium scale industry with specific reference to heat and noise.
    Singh LP; Bhardwaj A; Deepak KK
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(46):37-48. PubMed ID: 20160389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.