159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22918168)
21. Prognostic significance of the Ki67 scoring categories in breast cancer subgroups.
Niikura N; Masuda S; Kumaki N; Xiaoyan T; Terada M; Terao M; Iwamoto T; Oshitanai R; Morioka T; Tuda B; Okamura T; Saito Y; Suzuki Y; Tokuda Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Oct; 14(5):323-329.e3. PubMed ID: 24492237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Immunohistochemical BAG1 expression improves the estimation of residual risk by IHC4 in postmenopausal patients treated with anastrazole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.
Afentakis M; Dowsett M; Sestak I; Salter J; Howell T; Buzdar A; Forbes J; Cuzick J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jul; 140(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 23852223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differential expression of progesterone receptor, FOXA1, GATA3, and p53 between pre- and postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Hosoda M; Yamamoto M; Nakano K; Hatanaka KC; Takakuwa E; Hatanaka Y; Matsuno Y; Yamashita H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Apr; 144(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 24549642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic significance of Ki67 in Chinese women diagnosed with ER
Hu Y; Gu R; Zhao J; Yang Y; Liu F; Jin L; Chen K; Jia H; Wang H; Liu Q; Su F; Jia W
BMC Cancer; 2017 Jan; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28061893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and microtubule-associated protein Tau in high-risk early breast cancer: a quest for molecular predictors of treatment benefit in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial.
Pentheroudakis G; Kalogeras KT; Wirtz RM; Grimani I; Zografos G; Gogas H; Stropp U; Pectasides D; Skarlos D; Hennig G; Samantas E; Bafaloukos D; Papakostas P; Kalofonos HP; Pavlidis N; Fountzilas G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 18668363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between IHC4 score and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Sheri A; Smith IE; Hills M; Jones RL; Johnston SR; Dowsett M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 28447240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor.
Sheffield BS; Kos Z; Asleh-Aburaya K; Wang XQ; Leung S; Gao D; Won J; Chow C; Rachamadugu R; Stijleman I; Wolber R; Gilks CB; Myles N; Thomson T; Hayes MM; Bernard PS; Nielsen TO; Chia SK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 26846986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast.
von Minckwitz G; Sinn HP; Raab G; Loibl S; Blohmer JU; Eidtmann H; Hilfrich J; Merkle E; Jackisch C; Costa SD; Caputo A; Kaufmann M;
Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(2):R30. PubMed ID: 18380893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictive value and clinical utility of centrally assessed ER, PgR, and Ki-67 to select adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: TEXT and SOFT trials.
Regan MM; Pagani O; Francis PA; Fleming GF; Walley BA; Kammler R; Dell'Orto P; Russo L; Szőke J; Doimi F; Villani L; Pizzolitto S; Öhlschlegel C; Sessa F; Peg Cámara V; Rodríguez Peralto JL; MacGrogan G; Colleoni M; Goldhirsch A; Price KN; Coates AS; Gelber RD; Viale G;
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 26493064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tumour biomarker expression relative to age and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
Morrison DH; Rahardja D; King E; Peng Y; Sarode VR
Br J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 107(2):382-7. PubMed ID: 22713661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the expression of prognostic biomarkers between primary tumor and axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
Zhao S; Xu L; Liu W; Lv C; Zhang K; Gao H; Wang J; Ma R
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(5):5744-8. PubMed ID: 26191291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Progesterone receptor loss identifies luminal-type local advanced breast cancer with poor survival in patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Chen S; Huang L; Chen CM; Shao ZM
Oncotarget; 2015 Jul; 6(20):18174-82. PubMed ID: 26053183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation and comparison of CS-IHC4 scores with a nomogram to predict recurrence in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers.
Park YH; Im SA; Cho EY; Ahn JH; Woo SY; Kim S; Keam B; Lee JE; Han W; Nam SJ; Park IA; Noh DY; Yang JH; Ahn JS; Im YH
Oncology; 2014; 86(5-6):279-88. PubMed ID: 24903080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tumor gene expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes.
Cobleigh MA; Tabesh B; Bitterman P; Baker J; Cronin M; Liu ML; Borchik R; Mosquera JM; Walker MG; Shak S
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Dec; 11(24 Pt 1):8623-31. PubMed ID: 16361546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic Factors for Luminal B-like Breast Cancer.
Ding NH; Liu CF; Hu C; Yuan JQ; Liao WH; Xiao Z
Curr Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 39(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 31209809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estrogen receptor-beta expression in invasive breast cancer in relation to molecular phenotype: results from the Nurses' Health Study.
Marotti JD; Collins LC; Hu R; Tamimi RM
Mod Pathol; 2010 Feb; 23(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 19898422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters for evaluating Immunohistochemical biomarkers of invasive breast cancer.
Wang X; Liu D; Zeng X; Jiang S; Li L; Yu T; Zhang J
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 33413654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Frequency of breast cancer subtypes among African American women in the AMBER consortium.
Allott EH; Geradts J; Cohen SM; Khoury T; Zirpoli GR; Bshara W; Davis W; Omilian A; Nair P; Ondracek RP; Cheng TD; Miller CR; Hwang H; Thorne LB; O'Connor S; Bethea TN; Bell ME; Hu Z; Li Y; Kirk EL; Sun X; Ruiz-Narvaez EA; Perou CM; Palmer JR; Olshan AF; Ambrosone CB; Troester MA
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):12. PubMed ID: 29409530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.
Vohra P; Buelow B; Chen YY; Serrano M; Vohra MS; Berry A; Ljung BM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Nov; 124(11):828-835. PubMed ID: 27315045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
