These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22919053)

  • 1. Organ dose calculation in CT based on scout image data and automatic image registration.
    Kortesniemi M; Salli E; Seuri R
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Oct; 53(8):908-13. PubMed ID: 22919053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A CONSORT-compliant prospective randomized controlled trial: radiation dose reducing in computed tomography using an additional lateral scout view combined with automatic tube current modulation: Phantom and patient study.
    Peng W; Li Z; Xia C; Guo Y; Zhang J; Zhang K; Li L; Zhao F
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7324. PubMed ID: 28746180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.
    Coursey C; Frush DP; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Greenberg SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):W54-61. PubMed ID: 18094273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
    Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT.
    Suntharalingam S; Wetter A; Guberina N; Theysohn J; Ringelstein A; Schlosser T; Forsting M; Nassenstein K
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4072-4079. PubMed ID: 26943131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of image noise levels, scout scan dose and lens shield on image quality and radiation exposure in z-axis dose-modulated neck MSCT on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners.
    Bauknecht HC; Jach C; Bohner G; Meyer H; Scheurig C; Siebert E; Klingebiel R
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 19135816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquisition, preprocessing, and reconstruction of ultralow dose volumetric CT scout for organ-based CT scan planning.
    Yin Z; Yao Y; Montillo A; Wu M; Edic PM; Kalra M; De Man B
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2730-9. PubMed ID: 25979071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose dependence on subject size in abdominal computed tomography: Water phantom and patient model comparison.
    Li X; Yang K; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2309-2317. PubMed ID: 29582439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
    Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of scout radiographic imaging conditions on tube current modulation in chest computed tomography.
    Inoue Y; Itoh H
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Mar; 40(1):253-269. PubMed ID: 31914423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose estimations to the thorax using organ-based dose modulation.
    Lungren MP; Yoshizumi TT; Brady SM; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Zhou XR; Frush D; Hurwitz LM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):W65-73. PubMed ID: 22733933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between CT scout landmarks and lung boundaries on chest CT: guidelines for minimizing excess z-axis scan length.
    Cohen SL; Ward TJ; Cham MD
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):581-587. PubMed ID: 31410602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic heart positioning method in computed tomography scout images.
    Li H; Liu K; Sun H; Bao N; Wang X; Tian S; Qi S; Kang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3277-86. PubMed ID: 25227037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chest Computed Tomography Radiation Dose Optimization: Comparison of Automatic Exposure Control Strength Curves.
    Gyssels E; Bohy P; Cornil A; van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    J Thorac Imaging; 2016 Jan; 31(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 26447870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced dose helical CT scout imaging on next generation wide volume CT system decreases scan length and overall radiation exposure.
    Golbus AE; Schuzer JL; Steveson C; Rollison SF; Matthews J; Henry-Ellis J; Razeto M; Chen MY
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2024 Dec; 13():100578. PubMed ID: 38993285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans.
    Lee C; Kim KP; Bolch WE; Moroz BE; Folio L
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):891-909. PubMed ID: 26609995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exam-level dose monitoring in CT: Quality metric consideration for multiple series acquisitions.
    Li X; Yang K; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 30723934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scan length adjustment of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring scan: effect on radiation dose.
    Leschka S; Kim CH; Baumueller S; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):W272-7. PubMed ID: 20173126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.