198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22919556)
1. Uterine cervical malignancy: diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic correlation.
Shweel MA; Abdel-Gawad EA; Abdel-Gawad EA; Abdelghany HS; Abdel-Rahman AM; Ibrahim EM
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():42. PubMed ID: 22919556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study of the value of pre- and post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging examinations for advanced cervical cancer.
Csutak C; Ordeanu C; Nagy VM; Pop DC; Bolboaca SD; Badea R; Chiorean L; Dudea SM
Clujul Med; 2016; 89(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 27547062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical FIGO Criteria in Different Stages of Carcinoma Cervix.
Zubery MH; Rahman FB; Islam MN; Datta A; Rahman T; Mahdi R
Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 34605487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.
Marnitz S; Tsunoda AT; Martus P; Vieira M; Affonso Junior RJ; Nunes J; Budach V; Hertel H; Mustea A; Sehouli J; Scharf JP; Ulrich U; Ebert A; Piwonski I; Kohler C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1855-1861. PubMed ID: 33293284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Predictive Model for Parametrial Invasion in Patients With FIGO Stage IB Cervical Cancer: Individualized Approach for Primary Treatment.
Kong TW; Piao X; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 26512782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early-stage cervical cancer.
Zhang W; Zhang J; Yang J; Xue H; Cao D; Huang H; Wu M; Cui Q; Chen J; Lang J; Shen K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1292-8. PubMed ID: 24987919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High dose-rate brachytherapy for elderly patients with uterine cervical cancer.
Chen SW; Liang JA; Yang SN; Lin FJ
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2003 May; 33(5):221-8. PubMed ID: 12865465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term Outcomes of MRI Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.
Yoon A; Park JJ; Park BK; Lee YY; Paik ES; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Kim CK; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1252-7. PubMed ID: 27284726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Perniola G; Fischetti M; Tomao F; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Santangelo G; Lecce F; Piccioni MG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Oncology; 2020; 98(9):603-611. PubMed ID: 32492692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of uterine cervical cancer].
Matsubara M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 45(10):1115-22. PubMed ID: 8245590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of cervical carcinomas. Comparison of body-coil magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging with histopathologic correlation.
Preidler KW; Tamussino K; Szolar DM; Ranner G; Ebner F
Invest Radiol; 1996 Jul; 31(7):458-62. PubMed ID: 8818786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor size, irradiation dose, and long-term outcome of carcinoma of uterine cervix.
Perez CA; Grigsby PW; Chao KS; Mutch DG; Lockett MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 May; 41(2):307-17. PubMed ID: 9607346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancies between clinical staging and pathological findings of operable cervical carcinoma with stage IB-IIB: a retrospective analysis of 818 patients.
Qin Y; Peng Z; Lou J; Liu H; Deng F; Zheng Y
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):542-4. PubMed ID: 19780741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
