BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22919556)

  • 21. The negative predictive value of clinical examination with or without anesthesia versus magnetic resonance imaging for parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer stages IB1 to IIA.
    Bleker SM; Bipat S; Spijkerboer AM; van der Velden J; Stoker J; Kenter GG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):193-8. PubMed ID: 23221736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of imaging features and diagnostic values of MRI, CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma staging.
    Yu L; Zhang HF; Jiang DW; Zhao DY; Liu H; Shen LM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2018 Aug; 22(15):4784-4791. PubMed ID: 30070310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance imaging and its value in the staging of cervical carcinoma - Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and pathological images with FIGO staging system.
    Kirova G; Nedialkov K; Sergieva S
    J BUON; 2004; 9(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 17415805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy.
    Perez CA; Grigsby PW; Castro-Vita H; Lockett MA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jul; 32(5):1275-88. PubMed ID: 7635767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Irradiation alone or combined with surgery in stage IB, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of uterine cervix: update of a nonrandomized comparison.
    Perez CA; Grigsby PW; Camel HM; Galakatos AE; Mutch D; Lockett MA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb; 31(4):703-16. PubMed ID: 7860381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preoperatively Assessable Clinical and Pathological Risk Factors for Parametrial Involvement in Surgically Treated FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Canaz E; Ozyurek ES; Erdem B; Aldikactioglu Talmac M; Yildiz Ozaydin I; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulker V
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1722-1728. PubMed ID: 28617687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Pre-Operative Staging of Cervical Cancer Patients Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Clinical-Surgical-Pathologic Comparison.
    Ditto A; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Evangelisti G; Bogani G; Chiappa V; Martinelli F; Raspagliesi F
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 37046722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Cancer-Analysis of Patients from the Prospective Study on Total Mesometrial Resection.
    Stukan M; Buderath P; Szulczyński B; Gębicki J; Kimmig R
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. More accurate definition of clinical target volume based on the measurement of microscopic extensions of the primary tumor toward the uterus body in international federation of gynecology and obstetrics Ib-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
    Xie WJ; Wu X; Xue RL; Lin XY; Kidd EA; Yan SM; Zhang YH; Zhai TT; Lu JY; Wu LL; Zhang H; Huang HH; Chen ZJ; Li DR; Xie LX
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 25442332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Significance and implication on changes of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the diagnosis of recurrence squamous cell carcinoma of cervix].
    Li Q; Liu S; Liu H; Zhang J; Guo S; Wang L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 25877611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Operable Stages IB and II cervical carcinomas: a retrospective study comparing preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.
    Atlan D; Touboul E; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Antoine JM; Jannet D; Lhuillier P; Uzan M; Huart J; Genestie C; Antoine M; Jamali M; Ganansia V; Milliez J; Uzan S; Blondon J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):780-93. PubMed ID: 12377330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
    Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differential diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node metastases according to the tumor size in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
    Hong KS; Ju W; Choi HJ; Kim JK; Kim MH; Cho KS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jul; 20(5):841-6. PubMed ID: 20606532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a New Prognostic Tumor Score in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Integrating Clinical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Lindegaard JC; Petric P; Lindegaard AM; Tanderup K; Fokdal LU
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Mar; 106(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 31794837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
    Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.